IPCS INCHEM Home



    INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY


    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 50






    TRICHLOROETHYLENE






    This report contains the collective views of an international group of
    experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated
    policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International
    Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization.

    Published under the joint sponsorship of
    the United Nations Environment Programme,
    the International Labour Organisation,
    and the World Health Organization

    World Health Orgnization
    Geneva, 1985


         The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a
    joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the
    International Labour Organisation, and the World Health
    Organization. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and
    disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health
    and the quality of the environment. Supporting activities include
    the development of epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and
    risk-assessment methods that could produce internationally
    comparable results, and the development of manpower in the field of
    toxicology. Other activities carried out by the IPCS include the
    development of know-how for coping with chemical accidents,
    coordination of laboratory testing and epidemiological studies, and
    promotion of research on the mechanisms of the biological action of
    chemicals.


        ISBN 92 4 154190 3  

         The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission
    to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
    Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of
    Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which
    will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made
    to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations
    already available.

    (c) World Health Organization 1985

         Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright
    protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the
    Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved.

         The designations employed and the presentation of the material
    in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion
    whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health
    Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory,
    city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation
    of its frontiers or boundaries.

         The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers'
    products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the
    World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar
    nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the
    names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital
    letters.




CONTENTS

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR TRICHLOROETHYLENE

1. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

    1.1. Summary
         1.1.1. Properties and analytical methods
         1.1.2. Uses and sources of exposure
         1.1.3. Industrial exposure
         1.1.4. Environmental transport and distribution
         1.1.5. Absorption, distribution, biotransformation, and 
                elimination 
         1.1.6. Effects on experimental animals
         1.1.7. Effects on man
    1.2. Recommendations for further research

2. IDENTITY, PROPERTIES AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

    2.1. Identity
    2.2. Physical and chemical properties
         2.2.1. Pure trichloroethylene
                2.2.1.1  Chemical reactivity
                2.2.1.2  Chemical degradation
                2.2.1.3  Photochemical degradation
         2.2.2. Commercial trichloroethylene
    2.3. Analytical methods
         2.3.1. Identification and purity assessment
                2.3.1.1  Colorimetry tests
                2.3.1.2  Infra-red spectroscopy
                2.3.1.3  Gas-liquid chromatography
         2.3.2. Determination in environmental media
                2.3.2.1  Soil
                2.3.2.2  Water
                2.3.2.3  Air
                2.3.2.4  Foodstuffs
         2.3.3. Determination in human tissues and fluids
                2.3.3.1  Trichloroethylene
                2.3.3.2  Trichloroacetic acid
                2.3.3.3  Trichloroethanol
                2.3.3.4  Total trichloro derivatives
         2.3.4. Sensitivity

3. SOURCES IN THE ENVIRONMENT, USES, AND SAFE HANDLING

    3.1. Production processes, levels, and uses
         3.1.1. Production processes and levels
         3.1.2. Uses
    3.2. Handling hazards, and precautions
         3.2.1. Handling hazards
                3.2.1.1  Fire, explosion, and thermal decomposition 
                3.2.1.2  Chemical reactivity
         3.2.2. Handling precautions
                3.2.2.1  Personal safeguards
                3.2.2.2  Storage

         3.2.3. Recovery
         3.2.4. Disposal
         3.2.5. Emergency measures in case of accidental spills
         3.2.6. Occupational exposure

4. ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS, TRANSPORT AND DISTRIBUTION

    4.1. Environmental levels
         4.1.1. Soils and sediments
         4.1.2. Water
         4.1.3. Air
         4.1.4. Biota
         4.1.5. Food
    4.2. Environmental distribution and transport
         4.2.1. Equilibrium distribution
         4.2.2. Transformation in the environment
                4.2.2.1  Air
                4.2.2.2  Soils and sediments
                4.2.2.3  Water
                4.2.2.4  Biota

5. KINETICS AND METABOLISM

    5.1. Absorption
         5.1.1. Inhalation exposure
         5.1.2. Oral exposure
         5.1.3. Dermal exposure
    5.2. Distribution and storage
    5.3. Metabolic transformation
         5.3.1. Animals
         5.3.2. Human beings
         5.3.3. Drug and other interactions
    5.4. Elimination
         5.4.1. Studies on animals
         5.4.2. Studies on man
    5.5. Biological monitoring of exposure

6. EFFECTS ON ANIMALS AND CELL SYSTEMS

    6.1. Effects on animals
         6.1.1. Acute toxicity
         6.1.2. Short-term exposures
                6.1.2.1  Oral exposures
                6.1.2.2  Inhalation exposure
                6.1.2.3  Parenteral exposure
         6.1.3. Long-term exposure
                6.1.3.1  Oral exposure
                6.1.3.2  Inhalation exposure
                6.1.3.3  Parenteral exposure
         6.1.4. Interactions
         6.1.5. Immunotoxicity
         6.1.6. Effects on cell systems
         6.1.7. Carcinogenicity
                6.1.7.1  Conclusions

         6.1.8. Mutagenicity
                6.1.8.1  Gene mutation
                6.1.8.2  Chromosome aberrations
                6.1.8.3  DNA damage
                6.1.8.4  Mammalian cells  (in vitro)
                6.1.8.5  Mutagenic activity of trichloroethylene 
                         metabolites 
                6.1.8.6  Conclusions
         6.1.9. Reproduction, embryo/fetotoxicity, and teratology 
                6.1.9.1  Avian embryo system
                6.1.9.2  Mouse
                6.1.9.3  Rat
                6.1.9.4  Rabbit

7. EFFECTS ON THE ENVIRONMENT

    7.1. Aquatic organisms
    7.2. Uptake, distribution, storage, metabolism, and elimination 
         in plant and animal organisms 
    7.3. Effects on the stratospheric ozone layer

8. EFFECTS ON MAN

    8.1. General symptoms and signs
         8.1.1. Acute effects
         8.1.2. Chronic effects
    8.2. Effects on organs and systems
         8.2.1. Effects on the nervous system
         8.2.2. Effects on the cardiovascular system
         8.2.3. Effects on the respiratory system
         8.2.4. Effects on the urinary tract
         8.2.5. Effects on the skin
         8.2.6. Effects on the eye
         8.2.7. Carcinogenicity

9. EVALUATION OF THE HEALTH RISKS FOR MAN

    9.1. Levels of exposure
         9.1.1. General population
         9.1.2. Occupational exposure
    9.2. Evaluation of human health risks
         9.2.1. Acute effects
         9.2.2. Chronic effects
    9.3. Treatment of poisoning in human beings
         9.3.1. Emergency measures
                9.3.1.1  General points
                9.3.1.2  Ingestion
                9.3.1.3  Inhalation
                9.3.1.4  Dermal exposure
                9.3.1.5  Eye exposure

REFERENCES

APPENDIX I

REFERENCES TO APPENDIX I

TASK GROUP ON TRICHLOROETHYLENE

 Members

Dr R.F. Addison, Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Bedford
   Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada

Dr O. Axelson, Department of Occupational Medicine, University
   Hospital, Linköping, Sweden

Dr A. Di Domenico, High Institute of Health, Rome, Italy

Prof S.D. Gangolli, British Industries Biological Research
   Association, Carshalton, Surrey, United Kingdom

Prof M. Ikeda, Department of Environmental Health, Tohoku 
   University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan 

Dr S.E. Jaggers, Central Toxicology Laboratory, ICI, Macclesfield, 
   Cheshire, United Kingdom 

Prof N. Loprieno, Laboratory of Genetics, University of Pisa, Pisa, 
   Italy 

Dr C. Maltoni, Oncology Institute and Tumour Centre "Felice 
   Addari", Bologna, Italy 

Dr J.H. Mennear, National Institute of Environmental Health 
   Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 

Dr A.C. Monster, Coronel Laboratory, University of Amsterdam,
   Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Prof I.V. Sanotsky, Research Institute of Industrial Hygiene and 
   Occupational Diseases, USSR Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, 
   USSR 

 Representatives from Other Organizations

Mr J. Wilbourn, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyons, 
   France 

 Secretariat

Dr E.M. Smith, International Programme on Chemical Safety, World 
   Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland 

 Observers

Prof E. Malizia, Emergency Toxicological Service, Antivenom Center, 
   Umberto the First Polyclinic, La Sapienza University, Rome, 
   Italy 

NOTE TO READERS OF THE CRITERIA DOCUMENTS

    Every effort has been made to present information in the 
criteria documents as accurately as possible.  In the interest of 
all users of the environmental health criteria documents, readers 
are kindly requested to communicate any errors found to the Manager 
of the International Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health 
Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, in order that they may be 
included in corrigenda, which will appear in subsequent volumes. 

    In addition, experts in any particular field dealt with in 
the criteria documents are kindly requested to make available to 
the WHO Secretariat any important published information that may 
have inadvertently been omitted and which may change the evaluation 
of health risks from exposure to the environmental agent under 
examination, so that the information may be considered in the event 
of updating and re-evaluation of the conclusions contained in the 
criteria documents. 



                          *    *    *



    A detailed data profile and a legal file can be obtained from 
the International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals, Palais 
des Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland (Telephone no. 988400 - 
985850). 


ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR TRICHLOROETHYLENE

    Following the recommendations of the United Nations Conference 
on the Human Environment held in Stockholm in 1972, and in response 
to a number of resolutions of the World Health Assembly (WHA23.60, 
WHA24.47, WHA25.58, WHA26.68), and the recommendation of the 
Governing Council of the United Nations Environment Programme, 
(UNEP/GC/10, 3 July 1973), a programme on the integrated assessment 
of the health effects of environmental pollution was initiated in 
1973.  The programme, known as the WHO Environmental Health 
Criteria Programme, has been implemented with the support of the 
Environment Fund of the United Nations Environment Programme.  In 
1980, the Environmental Health Criteria Programme was incorporated 
into the International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS).  The 
Programme is responsible for a series of criteria documents. 

    A WHO Task Group on Environmental Health Criteria for 
Trichloroethylene was held in Rome from 10 to 15 December, 1984.  
Dr E.M. Smith opened the meeting on behalf of the Director-General.  
The Task Group reviewed and revised the draft criteria document and 
made an evaluation of the health risks of exposure to 
trichloroethylene. 

    The draft criteria document was developed by the ISTITUTO 
SUPERIORE DI SANITA, Rome, Director PROFESSOR F. POCCHIARI; the 
principal author was DR A. DI DOMENICO. 

    The efforts of all who helped in the preparation and 
finalization of the document are gratefully acknowledged. 


                          * * *


    Partial financial support for the publication of this criteria 
document was kindly provided by the United States Department of 
Health and Human Services, through a contract from the National 
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, 
North Carolina, USA - a WHO Collaborating Centre for Environmental 
Health Effects.  The United Kingdom Department of Health and Social 
Security generously covered the costs of printing. 

1.  SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH

1.1.   Summary

1.1.1.  Properties and analytical methods

    Trichloroethylene is a colourless liquid with a characteristic, 
slightly sweet odour.  It is used as a solvent in a variety of 
applications.  There are a number of techniques suitable for 
the determination of trichloroethylene including colorimetry, 
infra-red spectroscopy, gas-liquid chromatography (GLC), and gas 
chromatography/mass spectrometry.  In GLC, the use of flame 
ionization detection gives good sensitivity; however, electron 
capture detection is markedly more sensitive.  Methods are 
available for the determination of trichloroethylene in blood, fat, 
other tissues, food, water, etc. 

1.1.2.  Uses and sources of exposure

    A major use of trichloroethylene is in metal degreasing; 
other significant uses are in textile cleaning, solvent extraction 
processes, and as a carrier solvent.  It is no longer used as a 
grain fumigant and is now only occasionally used in anaesthesia.  
For practical use, trichloroethylene requires the addition of 
stabilizers (up to 2%). 

    There may be exposure to both the vapour and the liquid in the 
workplace, the highest atmospheric concentrations occurring in open 
degreasing processes.  Trichloroethylene may be emitted from 
industrial plants in the form of a vapour and in aqueous effluent. 

    The major part of the annual world production of trichloro-
ethylene (estimates range from 60 to 90%) is released into the 
environment. 

1.1.3.  Industrial exposure

    Exposure in the workplace is mainly through inhalation of 
trichloroethylene vapour, but skin contamination with the liquid 
also occurs.  The highest levels of occupational exposure occur 
in metal cleaning processes.  Atmospheric trichloroethylene 
concentrations up to several hundred mg/m3 have been recorded.  
Exposure during the actual production of trichloroethylene is 
relatively low because of the nature of the process.  Oral intake 
is insignificant in occupational terms. 

1.1.4.  Environmental transport and distribution 

    Contamination of water has been reported but, with the 
exception of contamination of water supplies through accidental 
spillage, levels have been very low.  Trichloroethylene is probably 
widely distributed in the environment, but usually only at fairly 
low levels, i.e., in the µg/kg range in sediments, in the low 
µg/litre range in natural waters, in the low µg/m3 range in air, 
and in the µg/kg range in aquatic biota.  The limited toxicity data 

available show LC50 values for aquatic biota in the mg/litre range. 
Trichloroethylene is degraded in biological  and abiotic systems; 
in air (where most environmental trichloroethylene is expected to 
occur), its lifetime is about 10 days.  It seems unlikely that the 
present rate of release of trichloroethylene into the environment 
would contribute significantly to depletion of the stratospheric 
ozone layer. 

1.1.5.  Absorption, distribution, biotransformation, and elimination

    The most significant uptake of trichloroethylene is through 
inhalation of the vapour, but uptake can also take place through 
the skin or via the gastrointestinal tract.  Inhalation exposure 
is monitored by determining time-weighted average atmospheric 
concentrations. 

    Following absorption, trichloroethylene is rapidly distributed 
and accumulates in the adipose tissue.  It easily crosses the 
placental barrier.  Trichloroethylene is eliminated unchanged in 
exhaled air and, to a lesser extent, in faeces, sweat, and the 
saliva.  It is rapidly metabolized, mainly in the liver. 

    At least 4 mammalian metabolites of trichloroethylene have 
been identified:  trichoroethanol, trichloroacetic acid, 
2-hydroxyacetylethanolamine, and oxalic acid; dichloroacetic acid 
appears to be specific to mice.  The major metabolites in human 
beings, trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid, are excreted 
in the urine.  Estimations of levels of these major urinary 
metabolites or total trichloro compounds in urine may be used for 
the biological monitoring of exposure. 

    There are species differences in the rate of metabolism of 
trichloroethylene to trichloroacetic acid, the rate in the mouse 
being more rapid than that in the rat.  Isolated hepatocytes 
obtained from the mouse and the rat accurately reflect the  in 
 vivo metabolic rates.  Isolated human hepatocytes metabolize 
trichloroethylene to trichloroacetic acid at a slower rate than rat 
hepatocytes. 

    In man, the metabolism of trichloroethylene decreases when 
ethanol has been ingested, and intolerance may occur. 

1.1.6.  Effects on experimental animals

    Trichloroethylene is a moderately toxic substance.  In terms of 
acute toxicity, LC50 values in rodent test species range from 45 to 
260 mg/m3, and oral LD50 values range from 2400 to 4920 mg/kg body 
weight.  The toxic effects of exposure are related to a depressant 
action on the central nervous system.  Central nervous system 
depression can lead to coma and death.  Liquid trichloroethylene 
has an irritant effect on the skin and eyes; trichloroethylene 
vapour is irritant to the respiratory tract.  Toxic effects on the 
kidneys are produced in rats by long-term oral administration.  
Minimal changes in the kidneys can occur after oral administration 
of 100 mg/kg body weight per day for 13 weeks and nephrotic changes 

can be found following oral administration of 500 mg/kg body weight 
per day, for 2 years.  In mice, toxic effects on the kidney occur 
after oral administration of 3000 mg/kg per day, for 13 weeks, and 
mild nephrotic changes following 1000 mg/kg per day, for 2 years.  
Also, in mice, oral administration of 6000 mg/kg body weight per 
day for 13 weeks produced necrotic changes in the liver.  
Continuous exposure of mice by inhalation to 810 mg/m3 
trichloroethylene for 2 days resulted in an increased relative 
liver weight, which decreased following cessation of exposure. 

    Some immunological changes have been observed in rodents 
exposed to trichloroethylene by inhalation at concentrations 
between 10 and 1000 mg/m3 for several weeks and also in those given 
trichloroethylene in their drinking-water (0.1 - 5 g/litre) for a 
similar period. 

    Trichloroethylene does not cause any biologically significant 
embryotoxic or teratogenic effects. 

    The evidence for mutagenic effects is inconclusive. 

    There is clear evidence that trichloroethylene is carcinogenic 
in mice with lifetime (2-year) exposures to 1620 mg/m3 by 
inhalation or oral adiministration of 700 - 1200 mg/m3 body weight 
per day.  There is some evidence that trichloroethylene causes 
tumours in rats; a low incidence of renal tumours occurred in rats 
exposed for 2 years to levels of 3240 mg/m3 by inhalation or 500 - 
1000 mg/kg per day by the oral route.  There are species and strain 
differences in carcinogenic response and the purity of the 
trichloroethylene and the nature of any additives affect the 
outcome. 

1.1.7.  Effects on man

    The signs and symptoms of over-exposure in human beings are 
mainly related to the central nervous system; for example, 
headache, drowsiness, hyperhydrosis, tachycardia, and, in more 
severe cases, stupor and coma.  Trichloroethylene is analgesic and 
anaesthetic; inhalation of concentrations between 27 000 mg/m3 
(5000 ppm) and 108 000 mg/m3 (20 000 ppm) have been used in 
anaesthetic procedures. 

    Fatalities have been reported through accidental or suicidal 
over-exposure to trichloroethylene.  In general, the lethal oral 
dose for an adult is of the order of 7000 mg/kg body weight, but a 
death has occurred following a single dose of 50 ml (75 g).  Deaths 
have been reported following inhalation of trichloroethylene, 
including a number that have occurred during anaesthetic 
procedures.  While respiratory depression cannot be excluded, 
it is more likely that cardiac arrest, related to the arrhythmic 
properties of trichloroethylene, was the cause of death. 

    In laboratory and work-place studies, demonstrable psychomotor 
impairment was found following inhalation exposure to 5400 mg/m3 

(1000 ppm) for 2 h, and reaction time was increased by exposure to 
a concentration of 1320 mg/m3 (245 ppm), under work-place 
conditions. 

    Effects on the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts 
are related to the irritant properties of trichloroethylene.  
Irritation of mucous membranes occurs with exposure to 
trichloroethylene vapour at concentrations of 810 - 3510 mg/m3 
(150 - 650 ppm).  At autopsy, following fatal ingestion, lesions 
of the gastrointestinal tract have been found. 

    Liquid trichloroethylene and its vapour at anaesthetic 
concentrations (27 500 - 108 000 mg/m3) cause eye irritation and 
superficial corneal damage, which normally recovers completely.  
Liquid trichloroethylene is mildly irritating to the skin but, if 
it is held in contact for any length of time, for example, by 
clothing or footwear, it can produce marked skin irritation with 
blistering.  Repeated contact produces defatting of the skin and 
dermatitis. 

    High oral doses (200 - 300 ml or more), taken suicidally or 
through misuse, have produced toxic effects on the liver and 
kidneys.  Hepatic necrosis and nephropathy have been found at 
autopsy.  The use of trichloroethylene in a confined unventilated 
space for 3 - 4 h has also resulted in liver and kidney damage.  
Addiction to trichloroethylene ("vapour sniffing") has produced 
liver and kidney damage, and deaths have occurred. 

    Chronic neurotoxic effects may occur, and a "psychoorganic 
syndrome", with lassitude and depression, has been described but 
has not been found consistently in studies on groups of 
trichloroethylene workers.  It is probable that many of the effects 
described were due to the metabolites of trichloroethylene. 

    Degeneration of cranial nerves has occurred following short-
term exposures to high levels of trichloroethylene, generally in 
enclosed spaces.  However, it is considered that the cranial 
neuropathy is probably due to breakdown products, mainly 
dichloroacetylene, rather than to trichloroethylene itself.  
Polyneuropathies have been reported following long-term exposure. 

    Data from epidemiological studies on carcinogenicity in 
occupationally exposed groups are inconclusive. 

1.2.   Recommendations for Further Research

1.  The toxic action and thresholds for toxic effects of 
    trichloroethylene in human beings and experimental animals, at 
    low levels of short- and long-term exposure, need to be defined 
    in more detail. 

2.  Studies are required for a full evaluation of the genotoxicity 
    of trichloroethylene.  Trichloroethylene samples of high purity 
    (with full data on the nature and the amount of any impurities) 
    should be used as well as trichloroethylene samples stabilized 
    with non-mutagenic compounds (e.g., amines). 

3.  The significance for human beings of the effects seen in 
    rodents with long-term exposures requires further study.  The 
    role of metabolism in carcinogenesis, both the rates and the 
    metabolites formed, and the production of biochemical responses 
    that may be the mechanisms of carcinogenic responses in target 
    tissues require further study and interspecies comparison. 

4.  In view of the equivocal evidence for mutagenicity in bacterial 
    and mammalian cell systems, there is an implication that 
    epigenetic mechanisms may be involved in the carcinogenic 
    effects observed in experimental animals. 

    It should be noted that trichloroacetic acid produced by the 
    metabolism of trichloroethylene has induced peroxisome 
    proliferation, with differences in response in isolated 
    hepatocytes from the mouse, rat, and human beings.  Peroxisome 
    proliferation has been implicated in the epigenetic induction 
    of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice and rats. 

5.  The pathological significance of trichloroethylene-induced 
    cytomegaly and karyomegaly of renal tubular cells and the 
    incidence in untreated laboratory rodents of tubular renal 
    carcinoma should be investigated. 

6.  There should be further epidemiological studies to investigate 
    the possible carcinogenic effects of trichloroethylene exposure.  
    Additional cohort studies should be initiated.  Registers of 
    TCA-monitoring data should be organized with epidemiological 
    studies in mind.  Case-control studies, particularly of 
    haemolymphatic, pancreatic, and genito-urinary tract cancers, 
    should specifically consider exposure to trichloroethylene in 
    industry, dry-cleaning operations, and via food, such as 
    decaffeinated coffee. 

7.  Biological monitoring should be extended and more attention 
    paid to interindividual differences in toxicokinetics and to 
    the factors responsible for these, such as anthropometric 
    parameters, sex, genetic make-up, use of drugs and alcohol, and 
    interactions with certain chemicals in the environment. 

8.  Workers with moderate levels of exposure to trichloroethylene 
    tend to have an increased incidence of subjective symptoms.  
    There should be a systematic approach to the clearer 
    identification, analysis, and evaluation of such symptoms and 
    their correlation with levels of occupational exposure in 
    different industrial environments. 

9.  Although, at present, trichloroethylene does not appear to be 
    a major environmental problem, this assessment is based on 
    relatively few data describing its distribution in the 
    environment, and its rates and routes of degradation.  More 
    comprehensive data should be obtained, and an assessment of 
    geographical or temporal changes in trichloroethylene 
    distribution should be made. 

    There should be studies on controlling the input of 
    trichloroethylene into the environment, and the provision of 
    disposal methods other than incineration should also be 
    studied. 

2.  IDENTITY, PROPERTIES AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

2.1  Identity

    Trichloroethylene is an aliphatic substance of the organic 
halogen and halogen-derivative families. 

Chemical structure:

                              H           Cl
                               \         /
                                C ===== C
                               /         \
                              Cl          Cl

Molecular formula:            C2HCl3

IUPAC and CAS name:           trichloroethene

Common synonyms:              acetylene trichloride, ethinyl 
                              trichloride, ethylene trichloride, 
                              1-chloro-2,2-dichloroethylene, 
                              1,1-dichloro-2-chloroethylene, 
                              1,1,2-trichloroethylene, TCE, TRI

Common trade names:           Algylen, Anamenth, Benzinol, 
                              Blacosolv, Blancosolv, Cecolene, 
                              Chlorilen, Chlorylen, Circosolv, 
                              Densin-fluat, Dow-Tri, Dukeron, 
                              Fleck-Flip, Flock-Flip, Fluate, 
                              Gemalgene, Germ-algene, Lanadin, 
                              Lethurin, Narcogen, Narkosoid, Nialk, 
                              Perm-a-Chlor, Pet-zinol, Philex, 
                              Threthylen, Threthylene, Trethylene, 
                              Triad, Trial, Triasol, Trichloran, 
                              Trichloren, Triclene, Trielene, 
                              Trielin, Trielina, Triklone, Trilen, 
                              Trilene, Triline, Trimar, Triol, Tri-
                              Plus, Tri Plus M, Vestrol, Vitran

CAS registry number:          79-01-6

Relative molecular mass:      131.40

Conversion factor             1 ppm trichloroethylene = 5.4 mg/m3

2.2.  Physical and Chemical Properties

2.2.1.  Pure trichloroethylene

    In its pure state, trichloroethylene is a colourless liquid 
with a characteristic, slightly sweet odour; the odour threshold 
for human beings is 540 mg/m3 (100 ppm) (Torkelson & Rowe, 1982). 

    Some physical and chemical properties of pure trichloroethylene 
are listed in Table 1. 

2.2.1.1.  Chemical reactivity

    Trichloroethylene oxidizes to yield acids, including 
hydrochloric acid (Aviado et al., 1976).  Its reactivity increases 
with rise in temperature and with exposure to ultraviolet radiation 
(UVR).  Under pressure, at 150 °C, it reacts with alkalis to 
produce glycolic acid.  With sulfuric acid, it reacts to produce 
monochloroacetic acid (Kirk & Othmer, 1964).  In the presence of 
alkali, dehydrochlorination may occur in solution as well as in the 
vapour phase, with the formation of dichloroacetylene, which is 
highly neurotoxic and carcinogenic for animals and probably for man 
(Henschler et al., 1970a). 

2.2.1.2.  Chemical degradation

    The chemical degradation of trichloroethylene in water is very 
slow.  In contact with red-hot metals or a direct flame, liquid or 
vapour-phase trichloroethylene decomposes to form phosgene and 
hydrogen chloride (Waters et al., 1977). 

2.2.1.3.  Photochemical degradation

    Photochemical reactions initiate the degradation of 
trichloroethylene in the environment.  When exposed to UVR and 
humidity, the compound decomposes to form acids that have mean 
half-lives ranging from 6 to 12 weeks (Correia et al., 1977).  With 
an OH- concentration of the order of 106 molecules/cm3 (accepted 
mean value), a calculated half-life of trichloroethylene is around 
5 days (De More et al., 1983).  Trichloroethylene exposure to xenon 
arc lamp radiation with a wavelength greater than 290 nm, at 
constant temperature, produces carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, 
water, hydrogen chloride, dichloroacetyl chlorides, and phosgene; 
the phosgene hydrolyses to produce carbon dioxide and hydrogen 
chloride.  Dichloroacetyl chlorides enter the hydrosphere as 
dichloroacetate anions (McConnell et al., 1975). 

Table 1.  Physical and chemical properties of trichloroethylene
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Melting point (°C)         -84.8 (freeze)               Windholz et al. 
                                                        (1976)

                           -87.1                        Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

                           -73.0                        CRC (1980)

Boiling point (°C)         86.7            (760 mm Hg)  Windholz et al. 
                                                        (1976)

                           -43.8           (1 mm Hg)    Windholz et al. 
                                                        (1976)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 1.  (contd.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specific gravity           1.46            (25/25 °C)   Snell & Hilton 
                                                        (1967)

                           1.4904          (4/4 °C)     Windholz et al. 
                                                        (1976)

(vapour density; air = 1)  4.53            (25 °C)      Windholz et al. 
                                                        (1976)

(vapour, g/litre)          4.45            (86.7 °C)    Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

Vapour pressure (torr)     5.4             (-20 °C)     Snell & Ettre 
                                                        (1970a)
                           20.1            (0 °C)       Snell & Ettre 
                                                        (1970a)
                           57.8            (20 °C)      Snell & Ettre 
                                                        (1970a)
                           305.7           (60 °C)      Snell & Ettre 
                                                        (1970a)
Other properties:

Refraction index (nD)      1.4782          (20 °C)      Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

 (vapour)                  1.001784        (0 °C)       Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

Viscosity (cP)             0.58            (20 °C)      Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

 (vapour)                  10 300          (60 °C)      Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

Dielectric constant        3.42            (16 °C)      Kirk & Othmer 
 (epsilon)                                              (1979)

Coefficient of cubic       0.00119         (0 - 40 °C)  Kirk & Othmer 
 expansion                                              (1979)

Surface tension (dyn/cm)   26.4            (20 °C)      Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

Critical temperature (°C)  271.0                        Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

Critical pressure (atm)    49.7                         Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

Dipole moment (debye)      0.90                         Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 1.  (contd.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Heat of combustion         1.751                        Kirk & Othmer 
 (kcal/g)                                               (1979)

Heat of formation          0.999                        Kirk & Othmer 
 (kcal/mole)                                            (1979)        
                                                                      
 (vapour)                  -7.00                        Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

Latent heat of             57.4            (86.7 °C)    Kirk & Othmer 
 vaporization (cal/g)                                   (1979)        
                                                                      
Flammability flash point (°C)

under various conditions   Non-flammable under normal   Kirk & Othmer 
                           working conditions; Vapours  (1979)
                           (12.5 - 90% v/v) in poorly-  CRC (1967)
                           ventilated rooms at          
                           temperatures between 30 and  ASCHIMICI (1980)
                           82 °C may ignite if in 
                           contact with high-
                           temperature heat sources; 
                           Vapour ignites (t>25.5 °C)   Aviado et al. 
                           if mixed with pure oxygen    (1976)
                           (10.3-64.5% v/v)

ignition temp. (°C)        410                          ASCHIMICI (1980)

danger of explosion:

 limits (% v/v in air)a    8.0 - 10.5      (25.5 °C)    Kirk & Othmer 
                           8.0 - 52.0      (100 °C)     (1979)

oxidizing properties       none                         ASCHIMICI (1980)

Solubility:

in water (g/litre)         1.07            (20 °C)      Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

                           1.24            (60 °C)      Kirk & Othmer 
                                                        (1979)

in organic solvents        completely                   Windholz et al.
                           miscible with                (1976)
                           several organic
                           solvents

in oil                     miscible                     Windholz et al. 
                                                        (1976)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 1.  (contd.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 n-octanol/water partition  Log Ko/w 2.42                Banerjee et al.
 coefficient (log)                                      (1980)

Organic carbon partition   Ko/w x 0.6                   Karickhoff et al.
 coefficient, Koc                                       (1979)

Bioconcentration factor,   Ko/w x 0.048                 Mackay (1982)
 KB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
a See section 3.2.1.1.

2.2.2.  Commercial trichloroethylene

    Trichloroethylene produced for chemical reagent uses has a 
minimum purity of 99.85%.  The commercial product can contain 
impurities and stabilizers as shown in Table 2. 
                                                       
Table 2.  Commercial trichloroethylene: examples of 
impurities and commonly-used stabilizers
------------------------------------------------------
Impurities                   Stabilizers
------------------------------------------------------
carbon tetrachloride         pentanol-2                              
chloroform                   thymol                                  
1,2-dichloroethane           triethanolamine                         
trans 1,2-dichloroethylene   triethylamine                           
cis 1,2-dichloroethylene     2,2,4-trimethylpentene-1                
pentachloroethane            cyclohexene oxide                       
1,1,1,2-tetrachloroethane     n-propanol                              
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane    iso-butanol                             
1,1,1-trichloroethane         n-methyl morpholine                     
1,1,2-trichloroethane        diisopropylamine                        
1,1-dichloroethylene          n-methyl pyrrole                        
bromodichloroethylene        methyl ethyl ketone                     
perchloroethylene            epichlorohydrina                        
bromodichloromethane              
benzene                           
------------------------------------------------------
a Now used to a much lesser extent commercially.

    Possible impurities depend on the manufacturing route, the type 
and quality of feed stock used, the type of distillation equipment, 
and the technical specification being met.  It is uncommon for any 
individual impurity to be present at a level in excess of 100 mg/kg 
and for the total impurities to exceed 1000 mg/kg; not all the 
impurities listed would be detected in any sample. 

    Stabilizers, in the form of antioxidants or acid-receptors 
(such as phenolic, olephinic, pyrrolic, and/or oxiranic derivatives 
and aliphatic amines), are usually added in concentrations that 
normally range from 20 to 600 mg/kg.  However, in some cases, for 
limited quantities and special uses, concentrations as high as 
5000 mg/kg are added.  The stabilizers used will depend on patent 
ownership and the technical specification being met. 

2.3.  Analytical Methods

2.3.1.  Identification and purity assessment

    The degree of purity of trichloroethylene can be established by 
a number of methods, described by Snell & Ettre (1970a).  Some 
spectral features of trichloroethylene are shown in Fig. 1 - 3. 

    Trichloroethylene can be determined by the following analytical 
methods. 

FIGURE 1
   
2.3.1.1.  Colorimetry tests

    In the Fujiwara test, trichloroethylene is treated with 
pyridine in an alkaline environment.  Solution absorbance is then 
determined at 535 or 470 nm (absorptivity: 18 - 32 litre/g x cm) 
with a sensitivity of about 1 mg/kg.  This test is suitable for 
other aliphatic halogenated compounds, and so is not substance-
specific.  Other complementary colorimetric tests that may enable 
trichloroethylene to be differentiated from other similar compounds 
have been reported by Snell & Ettre (1970b). 

FIGURE 2

2.3.1.2.  Infra-red spectroscopy

    In the gaseous phase, quantities are determined by measuring 
the optical density of the mixture at the selected wavelength of 
11.8 µm (847/cm).  This corresponds to a detection sensitivity of 
not less than 0.5 µg/litre (Fishbein, 1973). 

    In solutions of carbon disulfide, trichloroethylene can be 
measured, even in the presence of similar chloro derivatives, using 
the specific band at 10.8 µm (926/cm) (Snell & Ettre, 1970b; 
Fishbein, 1973).  Detection thresholds of some µg/litre can be 
attained (Fishbein, 1973). 

2.3.1.3.  Gas-liquid chromatography

    Generally, either packed or capillary columns (low-resolution 
or high-resolution chromatography, respectively) are used; the 
latter are recommended for complex mixtures containing substances 
similar to trichloroethylene.  A number of stationary phases can 
be used, such as paraffinic hydrocarbons (squalene, hexadecane, 
paraffin), Apiezon L, Carbowax (600, 4000, 20M), silicones (SE-30, 
550, SF-96-350), and arylphosphates.  In general, detectors such as 
argon ionization or flame ionization detectors (sensitivity: ~10 ng) 
are suitable for several types of analyses; the thermoconductivity 
detector is little used, because it is less sensitive (sensitivity: 
~250 ng).  The detection threshold drops considerably (~0.02 ng in 
air) with electron-capture detectors (ECD).  ECD response can be 
improved slightly by adding small quantities of oxygen to the 
carrier gas (Miller & Grimsrud, 1979). 

    Gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC/MS) is 
both highly selective and sensitive (Snell & Ettre, 1970b). 

FIGURE 3

2.3.2.  Determination in environmental media

2.3.2.1.  Soil

    High-resolution GC (hrGC-ECD) has been used for determining 
trichloroethylene in soil (De Leon et al., 1980).  The hrGC/MS 
combination has been used as a confirmatory technique, with a 
detection threshold of ~10 mg/kg (10 ppm). 

2.3.2.2.  Water

    Levels of trichloroethylene in water can be determined by 
hrGC/MS (Dowty et al., 1975), by GC with an electron-capture 
detector or an electrolytic conductivity detector (Nicholson et 
al., 1977; Dietz & Singley, 1979), and by various other techniques 
such as HPLC, hrGC, GC, and GC/MS (Eklund et al., 1978; Jungclaus 
et al., 1978).  Where specified, detection thresholds are in the 
region of 1.0 µg/litre, or lower. 

2.3.2.3.  Air

    GC/MS can be used to measure trichloroethylene levels in the 
urban atmosphere (Ioffe et al., 1977).  Herbolsheimer et al. 
(1972), Sawicki et al. (1975), NIOSH (1977a), Heil et al. (1979), 
and Makide et al. (1979) describe sampling and sample enrichment 
techniques.  Detection capacity may be as low as some ng/m3. 

    Fujiwara's test can be used to measure trichloroethylene levels 
in air (Rush, 1970). 

    Gas detector tubes (Kitagawa, 1961), activated carbon tubes 
(NIOSH, 1977a; Shipman & Whim, 1980), and activated carbon felt 
badges (Hirayama & Ikeda, 1979) are available for use in work-place 
environments.  Gas detector tubes are suitable for spot sampling, 
while activated carbon tubes and felt are suitable for time-
weighted average concentration determinations. 

2.3.2.4.  Foodstuffs

    High- and low-resolution GLC can be used for the determination 
of trichloroethylene and other aliphatic chloro derivatives in 
various foodstuffs (Entz & Hollifield, 1982).  The head-space 
technique is used in all cases.  The sensitivity of the method 
appears to be higher (< 1 µg/kg) for water-rich samples than for 
fat-rich foodstuffs (10 -50 µg/kg).  The coefficient of variation 
can be lower than 20%. 

2.3.3.  Determination in human tissues and fluids

    The methods described in this section are those normally 
used to determine the levels of trichloroethylene or its major 
metabolites (trichloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol) in 
blood and urine.  These methods can be used to obtain indirect 
measurements of exposure.  There are methods for the determination 
of trichloroethylene and trichloroethanol in expired air. 

2.3.3.1.  Trichloroethylene

    Blood or urine is distilled or aerated.  Any trichloroethylene 
vapour present is collected in pyridine, which is then subjected to 
Fujiwara's colour test (Seto & Schultze, 1956; Tada, 1969). 

    Trichloroethylene detection and determination in blood and 
urine samples are now generally performed by GC, which has largely 
replaced colorimetric reactions.  Samples are first extracted with 
solvents, and trichloroethylene concentrations are then determined 
in the extract.  There are various modifications of this technique 
(Stewart et al., 1962; Stewart & Dodd, 1964; Kylin et al., 1967; 
Stewart et al., 1970; Ertle et al., 1972).  Because of its 
volatility, trichloroethylene can be sampled using the head-space 
method (Monster & Boersma, 1975; Triebig et al., 1976; Astrand & 
Ovrum, 1976).  This method has also been successfully coupled with 
GC/MS (Balkon & Leary, 1979). 

    GLC alone (Monster & Boersma, 1975; Astrand & Ovrum, 1976) 
and GC/MS (Barkley et al., 1980) have been used to determine 
trichloroethylene in exhaled air.  The same methods, with suitable 
sampling techniques, may also be used for the determination of 
trichloroethylene in alveolar air. 

2.3.3.2.  Trichloroacetic acid

    Fujiwara's colorimetry test is performed on the blood or urine 
sample extract or, in the case of urine, directly on the sample 
itself (Abrahamsen, 1960; Soucek & Vlachová, 1960; Bartonícek, 
1962; Fawns, 1968; Tanaka & Ikeda, 1968; Tada, 1969; Weichardt & 
Bardodej, 1970; Ertle et al., 1972; Kimmerle & Eben, 1973; Mantel & 
Nothmann, 1977). 

    Trichloroacetic acid can also be determined by gas 
chromatography of the extract after methylation (Ehrner-Samuel 
et al., 1973; Ogata & Saeki, 1974; Nomiyama et al., 1978; 
van der Hoeven et al., 1979), by direct methylation of the 
specimen followed by head-space sampling and GC (Monster & Boersma, 
1975; Triebig et al., 1976), or by inducing trichloroacetic acid 
decarboxylation and measuring the chloroform thus formed (Müller 
et al., 1972; Buchet et al., 1974).  Ziglio (1979) determined 
trichloroacetic acid in subjects who had absorbed trichloroethylene 
in drinking-water.  The extraction and methylation method, as well 
as the method of inducing thermal decarboxylation and then 
injecting the chloroform thus formed according to the head-space 
method, were used (sensitivity of extraction and methylation 
methods is better than 10 µg/litre). 

2.3.3.3.  Trichloroethanol

    Trichloroethanol is found in the free state and as the 
glucuronide (urochloralic acid) in both blood and urine.  For 
total trichloroethanol determination, the glucuronide is 
hydrolysed.  The trichloroacetic acid originally present is then 
removed and the trichloroethanol is oxidized quantitatively to 
trichloroacetic acid (Vlachov, 1957).  The trichloroacetic acid 
thus formed is then measured by one of the methods previously 
described.  Alternatively, trichloroethanol can be distilled in a 
vapour stream and measured colorimetrically on the basis of the 
condensate resulting from the reaction with pyridine and alkalis 
(Bardodej, 1962).  The colour test can also be carried out without 
prior separation of trichloroethanol from trichloroacetic acid.  
The two compounds are measured by determining absorbance at 367 or 
440 nm, and at 530 nm (Cabana & Gessner, 1967; Ogata et al., 1970; 
Mantel & Nothmann, 1977).  Trichloroethanol can also be measured by 
determining the difference between the figure obtained for the 
trichloroacetic acid level and that obtained for all trichloro-
derivatives present after quantitative oxidation to trichloroacetic 
acid (Seto & Schulze, 1956; Tanaka & Ikeda, 1968). 

    Trichloroethanol can be measured by gas chromatography after 
quantitative hydrolysis of the glucuronide (Ogata et al., 1970; 
Ertle et al., 1972; Kimmerle & Eben, 1973; Ogata & Saeki, 1974; 
Buchet et al., 1974; Nomiyama et al., 1978).  The technique of 
head-space sampling has been used by Monster & Boersma (1975), 
Triebig et al. (1976), and Balkon & Leary (1979). 

    Trichloroethanol in exhaled air can be measured directly
(Monster & Boersma, 1975).

2.3.3.4.  Total trichloro derivatives

    In the Imamura & Ikeda (1973) method, urine samples are 
oxidized with chromium trioxide in heated nitric acid, allowed to 
cool, and made alkaline; pyridine is added followed by mild heating 
(Fujiwara test).  Solution absorbance is then determined at 530 nm. 

2.3.4.  Sensitivity

    Generally speaking, colorimetric test detection thresholds 
range between 0.1 and 1 mg/kg.  Greater sensitivity is provided by 
gas chromatography, which has detection thresholds of between 10 
and 100 µg/kg for trichloroethylene, trichloroacetic acid, and 
trichloroethanol. 

3.  SOURCES IN THE ENVIRONMENT, USES, AND SAFE HANDLING

    Trichloroethylene does not occur naturally. 

    It was first synthesized by Fisher in 1864 and became 
commercially available for the first time in 1908 in Austria and in 
the United Kingdom (Kirk & Othmer, 1964). 

3.1.  Production Processes, Levels, and Uses

3.1.1.  Production processes and levels

    Trichloroethylene is produced by three processes:  the 
dehydrochlorination of  sym-tetrachloroethane, the high-temperature 
oxychlorination of chlorinated products with one or two carbon 
atoms, or the chlorination of ethylene. 

    In Western Europe, production was approximately 250 000 tonnes 
in 1978.  The major producing countries are the Federal Republic of 
Germany, France, whose individual production capacity is of the 
order of 100 000 tonnes, Italy, and the United Kingdom.  Sweden 
and Spain are smaller producers.  In the USA the production of 
trichloroethylene in 1979 was 130 000 tonnes (US ITC, 1980).  In 
Japan, the annual production was approximately 74 500 tonnes in 
1981 and 67 500 tonnes in 1982 (Japanese Yearbook of Chemical 
Industries Statistics, 1983). 

3.1.2.  Uses

    Trichloroethylene is an industrial solvent mainly (85 - 90%) 
used for the vapour degreasing and cold cleaning of fabricated 
metal parts.  Trichloroethylene has also been used as a carrier 
solvent for the active ingredients of insecticides and fungicides; 
as a solvent for waxes, fats, resins, and oils; as an anaesthetic 
for medical and dental use; and as an extractant for spice 
oleoresins and for caffeine from coffee.  Trichloroethylene has 
been used in printing inks, varnishes, adhesives, paints, lacquers, 
spot removers, rug cleaners, disinfectants, and cosmetic cleansing 
fluids.  It may also be used as a chain terminator in polyvinyl 
chloride production and as an intermediate in the production of 
pentachloroethane (Defalque, 1961; Kirk & Othmer, 1963, 1979; 
Wetterhahn, 1972; Valle-Riestra, 1974; US CFR, 1976; Waters et al., 
1977; IARC, 1979). 

3.2.  Handling Hazards, and Precautions

3.2.1.  Handling hazards

3.2.1.1.  Fire, explosion, and thermal decomposition

    At normal handling temperatures, trichloroethylene behaves 
as a non-flammable, non-burnable substance.  Under normal 
conditions, it is virtually impossible to induce an explosion with 
trichloroethylene.  In the presence of air, at temperatures above 
400 °C, it produces phosgene, hydrochloric acid, and carbon 

monoxide.  In the vicinity of arc welding, phosgene and hydrogen 
chloride can be produced from trichloroethylene.  In vapour 
degreasing, using combustion heaters, precautions must be taken to 
prevent solvent fumes from entering the combustion air.  Containers 
of trichloroethylene exposed to fire should be cooled by sprinkling 
with water. 

3.2.1.2.  Chemical reactivity

    Trichloroethylene is practically non-reactive with water at 
room temperature, under normal storage conditions, and the 
stabilized product does not undergo any changes in the presence of 
air, humidity, light, or in contact with metals.  It is, however, a 
wise precaution not to expose the product to temperatures exceeding 
130 °C. 

    In the presence of strong alkalis, particularly if heated, 
trichloroethylene produces dichloroacetylene (Reichert et al., 
1980a), which is highly reactive and acutely neurotoxic to both 
animals and man (Reichert & Henschler, 1978).  Dichloroacetylene 
is also potentially carcinogenic (Reichert et al., 1980b).  Under 
normal circumstances in industrial use, this reaction is unlikely.  
However, under occasional laboratory conditions and closed-circuit 
anaesthesia, in the presence of soda lime, some dichloroacetylene 
may be produced. 

    Dichloroacetylene may be formed from trichloroethylene by a 
reaction catalysed by ionic halides in the presence of certain 
epoxides, including epichlorohydrin (Dobinson & Green, 1972). 

    Non-stabilized trichloroethylene can react violently with 
aluminium (especially in the form of dust or filings) giving off 
hydrogen chloride and hexachlorobutene vapour (McNeill, 1979).  
Not all stabilizers are effective in preventing the reaction with 
aluminium; therefore, a suitably-stabilized product should be used 
when cleaning aluminium, especially ultrasonically or where 
aluminium particles are present. Suitable products are identified 
in manufacturers' literature or in specifications. 

3.2.2.  Handling precautions

3.2.2.1.  Personal safeguards

    Accidental exposure to trichloroethylene under occupational 
conditions is more frequently associated with the generation of 
dense trichloroethylene vapour, e.g., misoperation of vapour-
degreasing apparatus (Sagawa et al., 1973) or the use of liquid 
trichloroethylene for cleaning the inside of a tank. 

    Individual protective measures should be related to the type 
and level of exposure.  When significant skin contact is likely, 
suitable protective clothing should be worn, bearing in mind the 
limitations of such clothing and the need to maintain it properly 
and replace it regularly.  To control exposure through inhalation, 
the use of full face masks with filters for organic vapours 

(basically for short-term or emergency use), self-contained 
breathing apparatus, or masks with air-line supply systems may be 
necessary.  Self-contained breathing apparatus should always be 
available for use in emergencies. 

3.2.2.2.  Storage

    Trichloroethylene can be safely stored in carbon steel or 
stainless steel containers.  It should not be kept in aluminium, 
aluminium alloy, or galvanized iron containers; plastic containers 
should not be used unless they are known to be suitable for the 
storage of trichloroethylene.  Storage areas should be cool, well-
ventilated, flame-proof, and shielded from direct sunlight, high-
temperature surfaces, or sparks.  Trichloroethylene should not be 
stored near food-stuffs, strong acids, alkalis, or oxidizing 
agents. 

3.2.3.  Recovery

    Used trichloroethylene can readily be recovered by 
distillation.  Trichloroethylene vapours in the aspiration ducts 
of plants can be recovered by adsorption on activated carbon and 
subsequent desorption. 

3.2.4.  Disposal

    Where trichloroethylene is not recovered and recycled, it may 
be disposed of by incineration.  Incinerators must be properly 
operated, at a sufficiently high temperature and for an adequate 
period of time, to ensure complete combustion and prevent the 
formation of other toxic chlorinated compounds.  The incinerator 
should incorporate a suitable scrubber to remove the acidic 
breakdown products. 

3.2.5.  Emergency measures in case of accidental spills

    The spilt liquid should be contained with earth, sand, or other 
inert adsorbent material to prevent it from spreading. 

    If possible, remove damaged containers to an isolated and well-
ventilated area, preferably outside, or transfer contents to 
another container by mechanical pumping. 

    Wash away small leaks with water, taking appropriate measures 
to avoid creating environmental pollution problems. 

    When necessary, the contaminated area should be marked off 
until the risk of dangerous concentrations in the air has been 
eliminated. 

3.2.6.  Occupational exposure

    Trichloroethylene is a widely-used industrial solvent and 
degreasing agent.  During production, exposure is relatively low 
and can be controlled, but users of trichloroethylene may be 

exposed to higher levels and under relatively uncontrolled 
conditions depending on the type of operation involved.  A WHO 
Study Group has recommended a time-weighted average exposure not 
exceeding 135 µg/m3 with a ceiling limit value of 1000 mg/m3 for 
not more than 15 min (WHO Study Group on Recommended Health-Based 
Limits in Occupational Exposure to Selected Organic Solvents, 
1981).  Some national occupational exposure limits are listed in 
Table 3. 

Table 3.  Occupational exposure limits used in various 
countriesa
--------------------------------------------------------
Country            Exposure  Limit     Category
                   (ppm)     (mg/m3)   of limit
--------------------------------------------------------
Australia          100       535       TWAb

Austria            50        260       TWA

Belgium            100       535       TWA

Bulgaria           2         10        TWA

Czechoslovakia     47        250       TWA
                   235       1250      CVc

Egypt              50        267       TWA

Finland            50        260       TWA

France             75        405       TWA
                   200       1080      CV

German Democratic  47        250       TWA
 Republic          141       750       STd (30 min)

Germany, Federal   50        260e      TWA(MAK)
 Republic of

Hungary            10        50        TWA

Italy              75        400       TWA
                   200       1000      skin irritation

Japan              50        268       TWA

Netherlands        35        190       TWA

Poland             10        50        CV

Romania            37        200       TWA
                   55        300       CV

Spain              100       535       TWA
--------------------------------------------------------

Table 3.  (contd.)
--------------------------------------------------------
Country            Exposure  Limit     Category
                   (ppm)     (mg/m3)   of limit
--------------------------------------------------------
Sweden             20        110       TWA
                   50        250       ST (15 min)

Switzerland        50        260       TWA

United Kingdom     100       535       TWA

USA

 a) OSHA/NIOSH     100       536       TWA
                   200       1072      ST (5 min)
                   300       1608      CV
                   1000      5350      IDLHf

 b) ACGIHg         100       535       TWA
                   150       800       ST (15 min)

USSR               2         10        CV

Yugoslavia         50        200       TWA
--------------------------------------------------------
a From:  ILO (1980) and IRPTC (1984).
b TWA (time-weighted average):  a mean exposure limit 
  averaged generally over a working day whereby, within 
  prescribed limits, excursions above the level 
  specified are permitted, provided they are compensated 
  for by excursions below the limit specified.
c CV (ceiling value):  a maximum allowable concentration 
  that must not be exceeded at any time.
d ST (short-term exposure limit):  a maximum 
  concentration allowed for a short specified duration.
e Suspected carcinogen.
f IDLH (immediately dangerous to life and health):  a 
  maximum level from which escape is possible within 
  30 min without escape-impairing symptoms or any 
  irreversible health effects.
g Notice of intended change to TWA 270 mg/m3 (50 ppm) 
  and ST 805 mg/m3 (150 ppm).

 Note:  Occupational exposure levels and limits are derived in 
       different ways, possibly using different data and expressed 
       and applied in accordance with national practices.  These 
       aspects should be taken into account when making 
       comparisons. 

4.  ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS, TRANSPORT AND DISTRIBUTION

4.1.  Environmental Levels

4.1.1.  Soils and sediments

    Trichloroethylene has been found in concentrations exceeding 
100 µg/kg in soils and sediments near production sites (IARC, 
1979).  However, samples taken further away from production sites 
show lower levels:  for example, in Liverpool Bay, United Kingdom, 
which is near an urban and industrialized area, concentrations in 
sediments ranged from a few ng/kg to 10 µg/kg (Pearson & McConnell, 
1975).  An organic-rich anoxic marine sediment from the 
Pettaquamscutt River in Rhode Island, USA, where there were no 
obvious local sources of trichloroethylene, contained 
concentrations ranging from undetectable to 70 µg/kg dry weight 
(Whelan et al., 1983).  Trichloroethylene was concentrated in the 
upper part of the sediment core, corresponding to the period from 
about 1940 to the present (determined by 210Pb dating).  The 
authors noted that the compound had been in use only since the mid-
1940s. 

    No relationship between trichloroethylene concentration and 
particle size or organic matter in sediments, as noted for higher 
hydrocarbons such as the DDT group (Pierce et al., 1974), has been 
reported. 

4.1.2.  Water

    Trichloroethylene is widely distributed in surface water, 
rain-water, well water, and drinking-water from various sources.  
Chemical industry discharges may contain concentrations up to 
200 µg/litre (Eurocop-Cost, 1976); some Milan well waters contain 
high concentrations (80 µg/litre) because of pollution (Cavallo & 
Grassi, 1976; Ziglio et al., 1983).  However, most reported levels 
in water are below this, and are usually in the range of 10 - 
100 µg/litre (Rook et al., 1975; Ewing et al., 1977).  Rain-water 
has been reported to contain concentrations in the µg/litre range 
(McConnell et al., 1975) and sea water from Liverpool Bay, United 
Kingdom contained a mean concentration of 0.3 µg/litre (Pearson & 
McConnell, 1975).  This lower range has also been reported in some 
Japanese rivers (EAJ, 1983) and in some well water in the USA 
(Coleman et al., 1976).  Even lower concentrations (7 - 11 
ng/litre) have been reported for northeast Atlantic surface water 
(Murray & Riley, 1973). 

    While trihalomethanes are produced during the chlorination of 
natural waters containing humic substances, there are no data 
indicating that trichloroethylene is produced in this way (Bellar 
et al., 1979; Bauer & Selenka, 1982; Otson et al., 1982).  However, 
treatment of sewage effluent resulted in a small increase in the 
trichloroethylene level (Bellar et al., 1979).  Trichloroethylene 
was found in drinking-water when the original raw water source was 
contaminated or when the liquid chlorine used for water treatment 

contained trichloroethylene as an impurity.  It is also an 
intermediate in the breakdown of tetrachloroethylene in some 
groundwater systems (Parsons et al., 1984). 

    Because data for carcinogenicity are inadequate for evaluation, 
a tentative guideline value of 30 µg/litre in drinking-water has 
been recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO, 1984). 

4.1.3.  Air

    The distribution of trichloroethylene in the atmosphere has 
been studied intensively, because of its possible contribution to 
depletion of the ozone layer (Lovelock, 1974) (section 7.3). 

    Air concentrations are in the µg/m3 range (Lovelock, 1974; 
Pearson & McConnell, 1975; Cronn et al., 1977; Singh et al., 1977; 
Rasmusson et al., 1983).  Murray & Riley (1973) reported much lower 
concentrations, in the ng/m3 range, in rural areas or from sea 
stations; one urban sample (Liverpool) contained 0.85 µg/m3.  In 
general, higher levels are found near industrialized areas (Pearson 
& McConnell, 1975; Ohta et al., 1976; Correia et al., 1977; Ziglio 
et al., 1983). 

    Data describing the partition of trichloroethylene between the 
gaseous and particulate phases in the atmosphere are not available. 

4.1.4.  Biota

    Pearson & McConnell (1975) have described trichloroethylene 
concentrations in marine organisms from Liverpool Bay, United 
Kingdom which is fairly close to an urban and industrialized 
region.  Concentrations ranged from a few ng/g to about 100 ng/g 
wet weight.  There was no obvious correlation between concentration 
and trophic level.  Typical background concentrations are probably 
around 10 ng/g wet weight. 

    Other studies have shown the presence of trichloroethylene in 
marine organisms such as invertebrates (1 µg/kg wet weight), fish 
muscle (10 µg/kg), sea-bird eggs (50 µg/kg), and seal fat 
(50 µg/kg) (Pearson & McConnell, 1975). 

    Pearson & McConnell (1975) analysed samples of marine organisms 
mainly, but not exclusively, from areas near a region where major 
organochlorine production plants were situated.  Less than 15 µg/kg 
wet weight was found in fish muscle (plaice, dab, mackerel).  
Values in sea-bird eggs ranged from 2.4 µg/kg for  Phalacrocorax 
 aristotelis (shag) to around 30 (23 - 33) µg/kg for  Alca torda  
(razorbill),  Uria aalge (guillemot), and  Rissa tridactyla  
(kittiwake).  Seal  (Halichaerus grypus) blubber and liver from the 
Faroe Islands had values ranging from 2.5 to 7.2 µg/kg. 

4.1.5.  Food

    Trichloroethylene may be present in foodstuffs as a residue 
from its use as a solvent in food processing or as the result of 
environmental contamination.  A study conducted by McConnell et al. 
(1975) provided a table of the trichloroethylene contents of some 
common foodstuffs (Table 4). 

Table 4.  Trichloroethylene in major foodstuffsa
------------------------------------------------
Foodstuff                  Concentration
                           (µg/kg)
------------------------------------------------
Dairy foods:

 fresh milk                0.3
 Cheshire cheese           3
 English butter            10
 eggs                      0.6

Meat:

 shin of beef              16
 adipose tissue of beef    12
 pig liver                 22

Oils and fats:

 margarine                 6
 olive oil (Spanish)       9
 cod liver oil             19
 vegetable oil for frying  7

Drinks:

 fruit juices              5
 light beer                0.7
 freeze-dried coffee       4
 tea in bags               60
 wine (Yugoslav)           0.02

Fruit and vegetables:

 potatoes                  3
 apples                    5
 pears                     5

Cereals:

 fresh bread               7
------------------------------------------------
a From:  McConnell et al. (1975).

    In some cases, upper tolerable limits for trichloroethylene 
concentrations have been set; for instance, 25 mg/kg dry weight 
in powdered decaffeinated coffee, 10 mg/kg dry weight in instant 
coffee, and 30 mg/kg dry weight in spice oleoresins.  The US FDA 
has proposed the prohibition of the use of trichloroethylene in 
foodstuffs.  The progress of this proposal depends on the 
completion of long-term toxicology and carcinogenicity studies 
that are being carried out.  Before 1976, the US FDA prescribed 
tolerance level for trichloroethylene in decaffeinated ground 
coffee was 25 mg/kg dry weight (US CFR, 1976). 

    Trichloroethylene has been reviewed on a number of occasions 
by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, most 
recently in 1983.  An acceptable daily intake (ADI) has not been 
allocated.  The Joint Expert Committee recommended that the use of 
trichloroethylene as an extraction solvent should be limited, in 
order to ensure that its residues in food are as low as practicable 
(Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, 1983). 

4.2.  Environmental Distribution and Transport

4.2.1.  Equilibrium distribution

    The distribution of trichloroethylene, which is observed in 
various environmental "compartments", is similar to that which 
would be expected from a consideration of its physical and chemical 
properties (cf. Appendix I).  The relatively high vapour pressure 
at normal environmental temperatures should lead to appreciable 
atmospheric concentrations; this tendency will balance the tendency 
of relatively high water solubility and low Po/w to lead to high 
water, biota, or sediment concentrations through either partition 
or adsorption.  The tendency of trichloroethylene to enter the 
atmosphere is demonstrated further by its rapid evaporation from 
water; its evaporation half-life is approximately 20 min at 25 °C 
(Dilling, 1977). 

                                                  
4.2.2.  Transformation in the environment

    Recent studies on the degradation of trichloroethylene in 
various environmental compartments are discussed below. 

4.2.2.1.  Air

    The main removal reaction appears to be that of attack by the 
tropospheric hydroxyl radical (Penkett, 1982), the steady-state 
concentrations of which are around 4 x 105/cm3 (Graedel, 1978).  
The decay of trichloroethylene is a function of the rate of its 
(bimolecular) reaction with the hydroxyl radical (Graedel, 1978), 
which is about 2.4/1012 cm3 per molecule per second at 25 °C 
(Howard, 1976).  This leads to a calculated reaction rate of 
approximately 4/103 per h, with the calculated lifetime of 
trichloroethylene in the atmosphere of around 11 days (Graedel, 
1978).  A half-life of the order of 5 days has been calculated by 

(De More et al., 1983).  Singh et al. (1977) reported a half-life 
of less than 2 days in a smog chamber.  Pearson & McConnell (1975), 
using unrealistically high concentrations of trichloroethylene in 
quartz flasks, estimated its half-life to be 11 weeks. 

4.2.2.2.  Soils and sediments

    When methanogenic bacterial batch cultures were exposed to 
low concentrations of trichloroethylene (simulating conditions in 
an organic-rich sediment or in a sewage treatment system), at 
35 °C, for 8 weeks, trichloroethylene concentrations were reduced 
by about 40% (Bouwer & McCarty, 1983).  If it is assumed that the 
reaction rate is halved with every 10 °C drop in temperature, this 
corresponds to an exponential decay rate (first order with respect 
to trichloroethylene) of about 2/104 per h at 15 °C.

    In a study on a laboratory fresh water-sediment system, it was 
concluded that trichloroethylene, formed by biotransformation from 
tetrachloroethylene, was itself biotransformed to chloroethane, 
cis- and trans-1,2-dichloroethene, and dichloromethane (Parsons et 
al., 1984). 

4.2.2.3.  Water

    Wakeham et al. (1982) measured a trichloroethylene exponential 
decay rate in a sea-water mesocosm of approximately 2.5/102 per day 
at 8 - 16 °C, which is equivalent to a rate of about 1/103 per h.  
This is similar to the rate described by Bouwer & McCarty (1983) 
for microbial degradation.  Pearson & McConnell (1975) measured a 
chemical degradation rate, in sealed bottles, which led to a half-
life estimate of 2.5 years. 

4.2.2.4.  Biota

    The only data available refer to the degradation of 
trichloroethylene in a soil-plant system (Klozskowski et al., 
1981) in which the rate of trichloroethylene loss was 10% per week.  
This was accounted for mainly by conversion to carbon dioxide, but 
with some evaporation of organic compounds.  This corresponds to an 
exponential decay rate of about 6/103 per h, which is about 10 
times the microbial decay rates. 

5.  KINETICS AND METABOLISM

5.1.  Absorption

    Trichloroethylene absorption in mammals can take place by the 
respiratory, oral, and/or dermal routes.  Intraperitoneal uptake 
has been demonstrated experimentally. 

5.1.1.  Inhalation exposure

    In all the mammalian species studied, trichloroethylene uptake 
is high during the first minutes of exposure.  It then decreases 
until equilibrium is reached between uptake by the blood and 
release from the blood to tissues, and by metabolism.  After 
equilibrium is reached, uptake remains constant for the remainder 
of exposure (Fernandez et al., 1975; Monster et al., 1976). 

    In human beings, the blood/air partition coefficient ranges 
from 9 to 15.  Daily body uptake has been estimated to be 
approximately 6 mg/kg body weight, for an exposure of 4 h at 
378 mg/m3 (70 ppm), and does not seem to be greatly influenced 
by the quantity of adipose tissue (Monster et al., 1976, 1979; 
Monster, 1979).  Trichloroethylene retention varies according to 
physical activity.  Under laboratory conditions, when human 
volunteers at rest were exposed to concentrations of 540 or 
1080 mg/m3 (100 or 200 ppm), for 30 min, 50% of the quantity 
inhaled was retained.  The percentage retained decreased from 50 
to 25%, when activity rose from rest to a 150-watt work load, but, 
because of increased ventilation, the absolute amount absorbed 
still increased (Astrand & Ovrum, 1976). 

5.1.2.  Oral exposure

    Uptake via the oral route is high because of the ease with 
which trichloroethylene penetrates the gastrointestinal barrier.  
In man, oral intake is a frequent cause of acute poisoning (Waters 
et al., 1977). 

5.1.3.  Dermal exposure

    In the mouse, dermal absorption increases linearly at a 
constant rate with duration of exposure.  For exposure periods of 
between 15 min and 5 h, absorption rates ranged from 59.8 to 
92.4 nmol/min per cm2 (Tsuruta, 1978). 

    Trichloroethylene applied to the backs of guinea-pigs (glass 
depot containing at least 1.0 ml) was absorbed and produced blood 
concentrations of 0.79 mg/litre after 0.5 h and decreased to 
0.46 mg/litre after 6 h, in spite of continuing exposure (Jakobson 
et al., 1982). 

    When one hand of each of 4 human male volunteers was immersed 
in trichloroethylene for 30 min, Sato & Nakajima (1978) found blood 
concentrations of trichloroethylene (samples taken from unexposed 
arm) of 2 mg/litre, immediately after the end of immersion, 

0.34 mg/litre, after 30 min, and 0.22 mg/litre, after 60 min.  
The trichloroethylene concentration in the expired air was 
0.28 mg/litre, 5 min after the end of immersion, 0.06 mg/litre, 
30 min after, and 0.024 mg/litre 60 min after. 

    On the basis of these data and the results of earlier studies 
by Stewart & Dodd (1964), it is thought unlikely that 
trichloroethylene would be absorbed in toxic quantities through 
intact skin during normal industrial use. 

5.2.  Distribution and Storage

    After absorption, trichloroethylene is concentrated in the 
cellular components but disappears rapidly (Fabre & Truhaut, 1952).  
This rapid disappearance occurs because substantial amounts of 
trichloroethylene are metabolized during and after exposure 
(Monster, 1979).  Trichloroethylene reaches the tissues via the 
blood system and accumulates, particularly in adipose tissue, 
because of its high liposolubility.  The oil/blood partition 
coefficient is approximately 750 (Droz & Fernandez, 1977; Sato & 
Nakajima, 1979).  Trichloroethylene crosses the placental barrier 
readily and has been found in fetal blood (Laham, 1970).  It 
was detectable in the fetus in 2 min, and a fetal/maternal 
concentration equilibrium ratio of 1:1 was reached in 6 min (La Du 
et al., 1971).  Data on the distribution of trichloroethylene in 
the tissues of some animal species (including human beings) are 
available but, because of the differences in treatment, comparative 
conclusions are not possible.  Trichloroethylene concentrations 
found in various organs and tissues from guinea-pigs, rats, and 
human beings are listed in Table 5. 

5.3.  Metabolic Transformation

5.3.1.  Animals

    Trichloroethylene is metabolized primarily in the liver and, 
to a much lesser extent, in other tissues.  Metabolism is by the 
mixed-function oxidase system and is dependent on cytochrome P 450.  
Qualitative differences between species do not seem particularly 
significant with the exception of dichloroacetic acid formation, 
which appears to be specific for the mouse (Hathway, 1980; Green & 
Prout, in press).  The major mammalian metabolites are free and 
conjugated trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid.  Other 
metabolites include 2-hydroxyacetylethanolamine and oxalic acid 
(Dekant & Henschler, 1982; DeKant et al., 1984).  Metabolism is 
illustrated in Fig. 4. 

    Quantitative differences in the rates of metabolism in 
different species are much more significant.  Mice metabolize 
trichloroethylene to a much greater extent than rats (Stott et 
al., 1982).  It is possible to saturate the metabolism of 
trichloroethylene in the rat, but not in the mouse, at doses up to 
2000 mg/kg body weight (Anderson et al., 1980).  Mice also produce 
more reactive tissue-binding metabolites than rats in the liver and 
the kidney (Stott et al., 1982). 

Table 5.  Tissue distribution of trichloroethylene in 
(A) guinea-pigs and rats following exposure to the 
compound, and (B) in human tissues obtained at autopsy
(levels of exposure not specified)
----------------------------------------------------------
                    (A)                     (B)                   
Organs or   Guinea-  Ratsb         Human beingsa
tissues     pigsa                  d          e
            (mg/kg)  (mg/kg)          (µg/kg)
----------------------------------------------------------
adrenals    22       -             -          -
blood       5        0.9           -          -
brain       9        1.0 (1.2)c    1          -
fat         39       9.9           8.2 (32)   4.9 (11.7)
            -        -             -          7.8 (42.2)f
kidney      14       -             2.0        -
liver       10       0.3           4.1 (5.8)  2.5
lung        7        0.7           -          2.2
muscle      2        -             -          2.4 (156.6)
ovary       23       -             -          -
spleen      13       -             -          -
----------------------------------------------------------
a From:  Fabre & Truhaut (1952), 6045 mg/m3 (1120 ppm) 
  x 5 h per day x 19 days.
b From:  Savolainen et al. (1977), 1080 mg/m3 (200 ppm) 
  x 6 h/day x 5 days).
c Cerebellum value.
d From: McConnell et al. (1975). Mean of 8 subjects aged 
  48 - 52 years.
e From: Bauer (1981). Mean of 15 subjects (Figures in 
  parentheses are maximum values).
f Fat from kidney capsule.

FIGURE 4

    Metabolically activated trichloroethylene binds covalently to 
the hepatic microsomal proteins and DNA,  in vitro.  This finding 
supports the formation of an epoxide intermediate (Banerjee & Van 

Duuren, 1978), though this has not been demonstrated  in vivo  
(Parchman & Magee, 1982; Stott et al., 1982). 

5.3.2.  Human beings

    As originally suggested by Powell (1945), the formation of the 
epoxide, an intermediate reactive metabolite that binds covalently 
with proteins (Bolt & Filher, 1977), has been confirmed by indirect 
spectral evidence (Uehleke et al., 1977).  The epoxide may undergo 
intramolecular rearrangement in 2 different ways (Henschler & Hoos, 
1982; DeKant & Henschler, 1983).  One pathway leads to chloral 
(Henschler, 1977a,b), which is further oxidized to trichloroacetic 
acid (TCA), or reduced to trichloroethanol (Leibman, 1965).  After 
oral administration, trichloroethanol is also partly metabolized 
into TCA (Müller et al., 1974).  Trichloroethanol is rapidly 
conjugated with glucuronic acid to form the respective glucuronide.  
The other pathway leads to the formation of dichloroacetyl chloride 
which, under  in vitro conditions, can lead to the formation of 
dichloroacetic acid.  However, under normal  in vivo conditions, 
dichloroacetic acid is not found, except in mice following the 
administration of very high doses of trichloroethylene.  Under 
these conditions, an "overspill" mechanism may operate (Henschler 
et al., 1979; Hathway, 1980; Henschler et al., 1983).  The 
excretion of chloroform in expired air and monochloroacetic acid in 
urine have also been proposed as minor routes of metabolism (Ogata 
& Saeki, 1974; Bartonicek, 1962).  Miller & Guenrich (1982) 
suggested that an epoxide was not an obligatory intermediate step 
and proposed an alternative model in which chlorine migration 
occurs in an oxygenated trichloroethylene P 450 transition state. 

    Trichloroacetic acid binds well with plasma proteins and its 
concentration in plasma is approximately double that in whole blood 
(Müller et al., 1972). 

5.3.3.  Drug and other interactions

    A number of commonly-used drugs might be expected to modify the 
extent of metabolism of trichloroethylene during human exposure.  
Although largely undocumented in man, the induction of the hepatic 
microsomal mixed-function oxidase system by drugs, taken for 
therapeutic reasons, or by exposure to certain environmental 
chemicals (e.g., phenobarbital, toluene, PCBs) can bring about an 
increased rate of trichloroethylene metabolism (Ikeda & Imamura, 
1973; Ikeda, 1974). 

    In human beings, the simultaneous administration of ethanol and 
trichloroethylene (100 mg/m3 for 6 h) causes an increase in 
trichloroethylene levels in both plasma (2.4 times the normal 
value) and in exhaled air (3.4 times), and a decrease in the levels 
of trichloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol (Müller et al., 1975). 

5.4.  Elimination

5.4.1.  Studies on animals

    The kinetics of the distribution and elimination of 
trichloroethylene, administered intravenously in Wistar rats at 
dose levels of 6, 9, 12, or 15 mg/kg body weight show that the 
blood concentration exhibits a first order, 2-compartment model 
exponential disappearance, and it has been suggested that a dose 
of 15 mg trichloroethylene/kg body weight is within the hepatic 
metabolic capacity in the rat (Withey & Collins, 1980).  Daniel 
(1963) showed that when trichloroethylene was administered orally 
to rats, the ratio of pulmonary to urinary elimination varied with 
the dose and that as dose increased, pulmonary excretion increased 
while urinary elimination decreased.  Further evidence showing that 
the metabolism of trichloroethylene is saturable in Wistar rats was 
obtained by Filser & Bolt (1979) who showed that the saturation 
point occurred at 350 mg/m3 (65 ppm), that the zero order Vmax was 
210 µmol/h per kg body weight and that the first order clearance at 
a dose of 350 mg/m3 (65 ppm) was 77 µmol/h per kg body weight.  
Stott et al. (1982) found that the pulmonary elimination of 
unchanged trichlorethylene in Osborn Mendel rats was only 2% of the 
dose at 54 mg/m3 (10 ppm), but 21% at a dose of 3240 mg/m3 
(600 ppm).  In contrast to these findings of a saturable process in 
the rat, The same authors showed that in the mouse, doses of 
trichloroethylene up to 3240 mg/m3 (600 ppm) were completely 
metabolized. 

    In dogs, exposed through inhalation, for 1 h, to 
trichloroethylene at 3780, 8100, and 10 800 mg/m3 (700, 1500, and 
2000 ppm), the excretion of trichloroethylene and trichloroacetic 
acid was correlated with the trichloroethylene concentration.  The 
rate of trichloroacetic acid excretion was higher than that for 
trichloroethanol.  One hour after exposure ended, the percentage 
of trichloro compounds in the urine was 0.7% of the total 
trichloroethylene absorbed (Hobara et al., 1983). 

5.4.2.  Studies on man

    It has been shown that man metabolizes trichloroethylene 
extensively.  Ikeda et al. (1972) showed that the capacity of 
workers to metabolize trichloroethylene was nonlimiting, at least 
up to a daily exposure level of 945 mg/m3 (175 ppm) for 8 h. 

    In human beings, trichloroethylene is eliminated unchanged 
through the lungs and is eliminated in the urine in the form of 
metabolites.  Elimination by other routes (e.g., faeces, sweat, and 
saliva) accounts for less than 10% of the total (Bartonicek, 1962). 

    After inhalation exposure, about 10% of the amount absorbed is 
expired unchanged, about 30 - 50% is excreted as trichloroethanol 
in urine, and about 10 - 30% as trichloroacetic acid in urine 
(Soucek & Vlachova, 1960; Bartonicek, 1962; Monster et al., 1976, 
1979). 

    The half-life of trichloroethylene in exhaled air and in the 
blood depends on the length of exposure and on the time of sampling 
after exposure.  The concentration follows a multi-exponential 
curve, compatible with at least 3 compartments:  lungs, blood and 
most other tissues, and adipose tissue.  After a single exposure 
to trichloroethylene, trichloroethanol reaches its maximum 
concentration in blood and urine almost directly after exposure.  
Thereafter, the concentration decreases, with a half-life of 
about 10 - 15 h (Müller et al., 1974; Monster et al., 1976, 
1979; Vesterberg et al., 1976).  After a single exposure to 
trichloroethylene, the concentration of trichloroacetic acid in 
both the blood and the urine increases for up to 20 - 40 h after 
exposure.  Thereafter, the concentration decreases with a half-life 
of about 70 - 100 h (Müller et al., 1974; Monster et al., 1979).  
Trichloroacetic acid, as such, has a shorter half-life of about 
50 h. 

    In a group of workers with long-term exposure to 
trichloroethylene at a concentration of 270 mg/m3 (50 ppm), median 
values of trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid of 330 and 
319 g/kg creatinine, respectively, were found at the end of a 
working shift; during the work-free periods, the metabolites of 
trichloroethylene were eliminated slowly (Triebig et al., 1976). 

    In a study on factory workers exposed to trichloroethylene, 
Ikeda & Imamura (1973) observed a half-life of 41 h for the 
urinary excretion of total trichloro-compounds (i.e., a combination 
of trichloroacetic acid and trichloroethanol).  This half-life is 
somewhat longer with oral administration of trichloroethylene and 
of chloral hydrate and is about 85 - 99 h after repeated exposure 
to trichloroethylene, because of the delayed formation of 
trichloroacetic acid from trichloroethylene and the 
trichloroethanol still available from the tissues (Müller et al., 
1974).  Thus, trichloroacetic acid will be found in the urine, even 
when trichloroethanol is no longer detectable (Ikeda et al., 1971).  
Trichloroacetic acid accumulates in the blood and urine during 
daily exposures to trichlorethylene (Monster et al., 1979; Müller 
et al., 1975). 

5.5.  Biological Monitoring of Exposure

    Droz & Fernandez (1978) used a mathematical model to study the 
effects of hourly and daily variations in exposure concentrations 
on alveolar air trichloroethylene concentrations and on the urinary 
excretion of trichloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid.  The 
determination of trichloroethanol in urine appeared to be more 
sensitive than the determination of trichloroethylene in exhaled 
air.  The excretion of trichloroacetic acid can be used for the 
qualitative evaluation of the preceding day's exposure.  In 
practice, blood analysis would be preferable to analysis of urine, 
because of the smaller individual variations generally observed 
with the former.  In studies concerning repeated exposure to 
constant concentrations, the smallest inter-individual variation 
was found in the concentrations in blood (Monster et al., 1979). 

    The measurement of total trichloro compounds in urine was 
described by Takana & Ikeda (1968).  The urinary trichloroethanol 
is oxidized to trichloroacetic acid and the total amount of 
trichloroacetic acid is then measured with the Fujiwara reaction.  
In the case of exposure to relatively steady concentrations, this 
has the advantage of being able to indicate small-scale inter-
personal variations.  It may be used as an index of exposure 
intensity, especially when the urine samples are collected at, 
or close to, the end of the workshift at the end of the work week 
(Ikeda et al., 1972).  However, other studies have demonstrated 
poor individual correlation between trichloroethylene exposure and 
the urinary elimination of the major metabolites, trichloroacetic 
acid and trichloroethanol (Boudène et al., 1983).  Separate 
measurement of urinary metabolites provides more information on 
exposure to daily fluctuating concentrations, because relatively 
high concentrations of trichloroethanol indicate recent high 
exposure, whereas relatively high concentrations of trichloroacetic 
acid indicate long-term exposure to high concentrations (Monster et 
al., 1979). 

    Trichloroethylene concentrations in alveolar air and in blood, 
shortly after exposure, indicate recent exposure concentrations, 
while the concentration several hours after exposure indicates the 
average exposure over the preceding days (Stewart et al., 1974). 

6.  EFFECTS ON ANIMALS AND CELL SYSTEMS

6.1.  Effects on Animals

    Data from acute, short-term repeated dose, and long-term 
toxicity studies on laboratory animals are summarized in Table 6. 

6.1.1.  Acute toxicity

    Acute toxicity data on common laboratory animals are shown in 
Tables 7 and 8. 

    Acute toxicity levels following inhalation exposure to 
trichloroethylene are summarized in Table 7.  Table 8 includes data 
on acute oral, dermal, intraperitoneal (ip), subcutaneous (sc), and 
intravenous (iv) LD50s for the mouse, rat, rabbit, and dog. 

    Von Oettingen (1955) reported that oral acutely toxic doses in 
rats produced gastrointestinal irritation.  Moderate increases in 
aspartate aminotranferase (EC 2.6.1.1) levels were observed in rats 
24, 48, and 72 h after a single 6-h exposure to trichloroethylene 
vapour at concentrations of 54 mg/m3 (10 ppm) and 540 mg/m3 
(100 ppm) (Deguchi, 1972); the increase at 5400 mg/m3 (1000 ppm) 
was small (Deguchi, 1972), presumably due to inactivation of P-450.  
According to Rigaud et al. (1977), intraperitoneal administration 
resulted in a significant increase in aspartate aminotransferase 
(EC 2.6.1.1), alanine aminotransferase (EC 2.6.1.2), and ornithine 
carbamoyltransferase (OCT) (EC 2.1.3.3) in the rat, whereas 
Wirtschafter & Cronyn (1964), administering 500 mg/kg body weight, 
detected only minor hepatic effects over the 12 - 24-h period 
following administration.  No evidence of kidney dysfunction was 
observed in mice following intraperitoneal administration of 
trichloroethylene at 0.004M/kg body weight.  Application of 2 ml 
trichloroethylene (7800 mg/kg), under an occlusive dressing, on the 
skin of 20 guinea-pigs, did not produce any deaths but, during the 
35-day observation period, there were reductions in body weight at 
1 week ( P < 0.001), 2 and 3 weeks ( P < 0.01), and 4 weeks 
( P < 0.05) (Wahlberg & Boman, 1979). 

     Skin irritation

    Trichloroethylene (purity 99.5%), applied (0.5 ml) to the 
shaved (non-abraded) skin of rabbits, for 24 h, under an occlusive 
dressing, produced severe skin irritation (Duprat et al., 1976).  
In another study, trichloroethylene (1.0 ml) was applied, 
occluded in a "skin depot", to the clipped skin of guinea-pigs.  
Histological examinations were performed at 15 min, 1, 4, and 16 h.  
Degenerative changes (pyknotic nuclei) were observed in the 
epidermis after 15 min and were progressive (pyknosis, karyolysis, 
junctional separation of the epidermis) up to the end of the study 
at 16 h (Kronevi et al., 1981). 


Table 6.  Concentrations of trichloroethylene at which no effects were observed in experimental animals 
exposed through inhalation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species     Concentration     Duration             Biological endpoints          Reference
            (mg/m3) at                             being investigated
            which no effects
            were observed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rat         3000              7 h                  mortality                     Adams et al. (1951)

            6400              1.4 h                mortality                     Adams et al. (1951)

            12 000            0.6 h                mortality                     Adams et al. (1951)

            20 000            0.4 h                mortality                     Adams et al. (1951)

            200               7 h per day, 5 days  mortality                     Adams et al. (1951)
                              per week, for 26
                              weeks

            400               8 h per day for      mortality; body weight;       Battig et al. (1963)
                              5 days               learning capacity

            730               8 h per day, 5       mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
                              days per week for    haematology; histology of     (1967)
                              6 weeks              heart, liver, lung, spleen,
                                                   and kidneys

            35a               90 days              mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
                                                   haematology; histology of     (1967)
                                                   heart, liver, lung, spleen,
                                                   and kidneys

guinea-pig  730               8 h per day, 5       mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
                              days per week for    haematology; histology        (1967)
                              6 weeks

            35                90 days              mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
                                                   haematology; histology        (1967)
                                                   histology
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 6.  (contd.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species     Concentration     Duration             Biological endpoints          Reference
            (mg/m3) at                             being investigated
            which no effects
            were observed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
guinea-pig  100               7 h per day, 5       mortality                     Adams et al. (1951)
 (contd.)                     days per week for
                              26 weeks

monkey      730               8 h per day, 5       mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
 (squirrel)                   days per week for    haematology; histology of     (1967)
                              6 weeks              heart, liver, lung, spleen,
                                                   and kidneys

            35                90 days              mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
                                                   haematology; histology of     (1967)
                                                   heart, liver, lung, spleen,
                                                   and kidneys

monkey      400               7 h per day, 5       mortality                     Adams et al. (1951)
 (Rhesus)                     days per week for
                              26 weeks

rabbit      730               8 h per day, 5       mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
                              days per week for    haematology; histology of     (1967)
                              6 weeks              heart, liver, lung, spleen,
                                                   and kidneys

            35                90 days              mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
                                                   haematology; histology of     (1967)
                                                   heart, liver, lung, spleen,
                                                   and kidneys

            200               7 h per day, 5       mortality                     Adams et al. (1951)
                              days per week for
                              6 weeks

dog         730               8 h per day, 5       mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
                              days per week for    haematology; histology of     (1967)
                              6 weeks              heart, liver, lung, spleen,
                                                   and kidneys
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Table 6.  (contd.)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species     Concentration     Duration             Biological endpoints          Reference
            (mg/m3) at                             being investigated
            which no effects
            were observed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
dog         35                90 days              mortality; body weight;       Prendergast et al.
 (contd.)                                          haematology; histology of     (1967)
                                                   heart, liver, lung, spleen,
                                                   and kidneys

mouseb      5500              20 min               anaesthesia                   Gehring (1968)

            5500              100 min              liver injury (elevated SGPT)  Gehring (1968)
            5500              300 min              mortality                     Gehring (1968)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a Kalashmikova et al. (1976) reported that rats exposed to 50 mg/m3 for 5 h per day, for 90 days, showed 
  damage to parenchyma in liver and kidney.
b Kjellstrand et al. (1983) reported that male NMRI mice 
continuously exposed to 200 mg/m3 (37 ppm) for 
  30 days showed increased plasma butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) (EC 3.1.1.8) activity; female mice did 
  not show any increase in BuChE activity; there was a significant increase in liver weight at 200 mg/m3 
  (37 ppm) in both sexes.
Table 7.  Acute toxicity of trichloroethylene administered via
inhalation to laboratory animals
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Species  Toxicity         Exposure            Reference
         index     ------------------------
                   level           duration
                   (ppm)   (mg/litre)  (h)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Rat      LC100     20 000  107         0.4    Adams et al. (1951)
         LC100     12 000  64.2        1.4    Adams et al. (1951)
         LC100     2500    13.4        7.0    Adams et al. (1951)
         LC50      26 300  140.7       1      Vernot et al. (1977)
         LC50      12 500  66.9        4      Siegel et al. (1971)
         LCL0a     8000    42.8        4      Smyth et al. (1969)

Mouse    LC100     8000    42.7        2      Von Oettingen (1955)
         LC100     5600    30.0        9.75   Gehring (1968)
         LC50      8450    45.1        4      Kylin et al. (1962)
         LC50      41 122  220         0.33   Aviado et al. (1976)
         LC50      49 000  262         0.50   Vernot et al. (1977)
         LCL0a     3000    16.0        2      Lazarev (1929)
         LC50              40          4      Lazarev & Gadaskina
                                              (1977)

Guinea-  LC100     37 000  197.8       0.67   Von Oettingen (1955)
pig

Cat      LCL0a     6074    32.5        2      Lehmann & Schmidt-Kehl
                                              (1936)

Rabbit   LC        5000    26.75       14.28  McCord (1932)
         LC        10 000  53.5        2.5    McCord (1932)
         LC        20 000  107         2      McCord (1932)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
a LCLO = lowest published lethal concentration.

     Eye irritation

    Instillation of 0.1 ml of trichloroethylene (purity 99.5%) 
into rabbit eyes produced mild to moderate conjunctivitis with 
superficial epithelial abrasion.  At 7 days, there was a resolving 
keratitis with complete recovery within 2 weeks (Duprat et al., 
1976). 

6.1.2.  Short-term exposures

6.1.2.1.  Oral exposures

    In a US NTP study (1983), groups of 10 male and 10 female 
F344/N rats were administered trichloroethylene (in corn oil, by 
gavage) at doses ranging from 125 to 2000 mg/kg body weight (males) 
and 625 to 1000 mg/kg (females), 5 times per week, for 13 weeks.  
All rats survived the 13-week study, but males receiving the 
2000 mg/kg dose exhibited a 24% decrease in body-weight gain.  At 
the 1000 mg/kg dose, final body weights for males and for females 
were similar to those of the controls. 

Table 8.  Acute oral, dermal, intraperitoneal, subcutaneous, and
intravenous LD50s for trichloroethylene in laboratory animals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Species  Oral         Dermal   Intraperitoneal  Subcutaneous  Intravenous
         (mg/kg body  (ml/kg   (mg/kg body      (mg/kg body   (mg/kg body
         weight)      body     weight)          weight)       weight)
                      weight)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rat      49201                 27252

Dog      56803                 2.8004                         1505,a

Mouse    28506,b               32107,b          144010        3411
         240012                31508,b
                               30009,c
                               1.2006,b

Rabbit                201
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 From:  Smyth et al. (1969).                 a LDL0.     
2 From:  Rigaud et al. (1977).                b In 24 h.  
3 From:  Christensen et al. (1974).           c In 14 day.
4 From:  Klaassen & Plaa (1967).
5 From:  Barsoum & Saad (1934).
6 From:  Aviado et al. (1976).
7 From:  Klaassen & Plaa (1966).
8 From:  Gehring (1968).
9 From:  Gradiski et al. (1974).
10 From:  Plaa et al. (1958).
11 From:  NIOSH (1977b).
12 From:  Tucker et al. (1982).
                                                                
    Histopathological examination of tissues from animals receiving 
the highest doses showed minimal or mild cytomegaly and karyomegaly 
of the renal tubular epithelial cells in the inner cortex in 8/9 
males dosed with 2000 mg/kg per day, and the same effect, graded as 
equivocal or mild, was seen in 5/10 females that had received the 
1000 mg/kg per day dose. 

    The results of this 13-week study in F344/N rats were 
essentially similar to those of an earlier 8-week study conducted 
on Osborne-Mendel rats (NCI, 1976).  In this study, only doses in 
excess of 5000 mg/kg per day were lethal for rats.  Doses of 
1000 mg/kg per day had no effect on body-weight gains in males, 
but depressed weight gains in females by approximately 15%. 

    Groups of 10 male and 10 female B6C3F1 mice received 
trichloroethylene (by gavage in corn oil) at doses ranging from 
375 to 6000 mg/kg body weight, 5 times per week for 13 weeks.  All 
males and 9/10 females receiving 6000 mg/kg, 7/10 males and 1/10 
females receiving 3000 mg/kg, and 2/10 males and 1/10 females 
receiving 1500 mg/kg died.  Mean body weights of male mice dosed 
with 750, 1500, or 3000 mg/kg were depressed by 11%, 19%, and 17%, 
respectively, relative to the controls.  Mean body weights of 
control and treated groups of female mice were similar (US NTP, 
1983). 

    Liver weights (both absolute and as percentage body weight) 
increased in a dose-related fashion.  Liver weights were increased 
by more than 10% relative to the controls for males receiving 
750 mg/kg body weight or more and for females receiving 1500 mg/kg 
or more. 

    Histopathological examination showed hepatic centrilobular 
necrosis (6/10 males and 1/10 females administered 6000 mg/kg).  
This lesion was not seen in either males or females administered 
3000 mg/kg, but 2/10 males had multifocal areas of calcification 
scattered throughout their livers.  Multi-focal calcification was 
also seen in the liver of the single female mouse that survived the 
6000 mg/kg dosage regimen.  One female in the 3000 mg/kg dose group 
developed a hepatocellular adenoma, an extremely rare lesion in 
female mice of this age (20 weeks). 

    Examination of renal tissues showed the presence of mild to 
moderate cytomegaly and karyomegaly of the renal tubular epithelial 
cells of the inner cortex.  These changes were found in only 1 of 
the 23 mice (13 males and 10 females) that died after receiving 
doses of 3000 or 6000 mg/kg for up to 6 weeks.  However, the 
changes were found in all 4 of the males that died after receiving 
the 3000 mg/kg dose for 7 - 13 weeks, and in all animals that 
survived the 6000 mg/kg (1/10 females) and the 3000 mg/kg doses 
(3/10 males and 9/10 females).  Tissues from mice receiving lower 
doses of trichloroethylene were not examined. 

    Trichloroethylene administered orally to mice at doses in 
excess of 500 mg/kg for 10 days produced proliferation of hepatic 
peroxisome as demonstrated by increased cyanide-insensitive 
palmitoyl CoA oxidation (PCO) and electron microscopy.  In the 
rat, trichloroethylene did not have any effect on peroxisome 
proliferation.  Trichloroacetic acid administered for 10 days 
increased hepatic peroxisome proliferation in both species (Elcombe 
et al., 1982).  It is possible that the rapid rate of 
trichloroethylene metabolism in the mouse, together with the 
enterohepatic circulation of trichloroacetic acid, leads to 
high steady-state blood levels of trichloracetic acid and the 
concomitant proliferation of peroxisomes. 

    Primary cultures of isolated mouse and rat hepatocytes have 
been found to metabolize trichloroethylene to trichloroacetic acid 
at rates comparable to those in intact animals.  Similarly, the 
isolated hepatocytes respond to exposure to trichloroacetic acid 
by peroxisome proliferation.  Isolated human hepatocytes have been 
found to produce trichloracetic acid from trichloroethylene at a 
lower rate than that in the rat.  Trichloroacetic acid does not 
induce peroxisome proliferation in human hepatocytes (Elcombe, 
1985). 

6.1.2.2.  Inhalation exposure

    In the rat, exposure to 81 000 mg/m3 (15 000 ppm) for a period 
of 2 - 4 min produced complete anaesthesia within 9 min (Schumacher 
& Grandjean, 1960).  In a study on mice, exposure to 36 7000 mg/m3 
(6800 ppm) for 10 - 11 min or 64 800 mg/m3 (12 000 ppm) for 5 - 
6 min produced complete anaesthesia (Friberg et al., 1953).  In 
another study on mice, exposure to 29 700 mg/m3 (5500 ppm) produced 
anaesthesia in 46 min (Gehring, 1968). 

    Studies conducted on rats by Vissarionova et al. (1975) showed 
that concentrations of 5000 mg/m3 administered for 5 h a day, for 
1 week, resulted in an increase in liver and kidney weight (21.6% 
and 18%, respectively), and a decrease in alkaline phosphatase and 
RNA-dependent hepatic dehydrogenase.  Histological changes have also 
been noted in hepatic and renal parenchyma by Kalashnikova et al. 
(1976). 

    With doses of 1080 mg/m3 (200 ppm) administered for 6 h daily 
for 4 days, Savolainen et al. (1977) found that rats exhibited 
greater motor activity and less cerebral RNA, 5 days after the last 
exposure, and an accumulation of trichloroethylene in perirenal 
fat. 

    Doses of 250, 500, 800, and 1200 mg/m3 administered for 15 - 
90 h resulted in increases in intracellular lipids (Verne et al., 
1959). 

    No effects were noticed in rats administered 1080 mg/m3 (200 
ppm) for 4 h a day for 4 days (Grandjean, 1960). 

    Continuous exposure of rats, mice, and gerbils by inhalation to 
trichloroethylene at 810 mg/m3 (150 ppm), for periods ranging from 
2 to 30 days, produced liver enlargement in all species; the mouse 
was the most severely affected.  After the end of exposure, the 
liver weights of the mice decreased rapidly.  An increased kidney 
weight was noted in gerbils (Kjellstrand et al., 1981a). 

    In another study in which 7 different strains of mice (wild, 
C57BL, DBA, B6CBA, A/su, NZB, and NMRI) were continuously exposed 
to a trichloroethylene concentration of 810 mg/m3 (150 ppm), 
Kjellstrand et al. (1983a) reported large increases in liver weight 
in all strains with minimal changes in kidney and spleen weights.  
Plasma butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) (EC 3.1.1.8) activity 
increased in males of all strains and in females of strains A/su 
and NZB, but to a lesser extent than in the corresponding males.  
In a further study, with continuous exposure to concentrations of 
200 - 1620 mg/m3 (37 - 300 ppm), plasma BuChE increased in male 
mice in a time- and concentration-dependent manner.  Liver weight 
increased in a time- and concentration-dependent manner in both 
sexes. 

    Exposure of rats, guinea-pigs, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys to 
3825 mg/m3, for 8 h per day, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks, resulted 
in a loss of overall body weight in dogs and monkeys.  There were 
no changes in haematological or liver enzyme parameters 
(Prendergast et al., 1967). 

    Groups of male Swiss Webster mice were exposed to 54 000 mg/m3 
(10 000 ppm) for 1 or 4 h, daily, for 5 consecutive days.  In the 
4-h group, the NADPH cytochrome c reductase (EC 1.6.99.3) activity 
in the lung decreased, but that in the liver increased.  In the 
lungs of this group, there were platelet thrombi and vacuolization 
of bronchial epithelial cells.  There were no changes in the liver.  
It was concluded that the reduced activity of the pulmonary mixed-
function oxidase system reflected injury to the lungs (Lewis et 
al., 1984). 

    Rabbits exposed to 15 000 mg/m3 (2790 ppm) for 4 h per day, 
6 days a week for 45 days, developed severe normocytic anaemia, 
leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia due to toxic effects on the bone 
marrow (Mazza & Brancaccio, 1967). 

    In rats, urinary levels of trichloro-substituted metabolites 
and the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes (cytochrome P-450) 
were related to the duration of trichloroethylene anaesthesia 
(Moslen et al., 1977).  Trichloroethylene hepatotoxicity in the rat 
produces increased levels of serum transaminases.  Hetaptotoxicity 
increases the activity of drug-metabolizing enzymes (cytochrome 
P-450) (correlation coefficient: 0.95) and the urinary excretion of 
trichloro-metabolites (correlation coefficient: 0.88) (Moslen et 
al., 1977). 

    Cytotoxic effects have been observed in the kidney and liver of 
dogs subjected to 81 000 mg/m3 (1.5%; 15 000 ppm) trichloroethylene 
anaesthesia (Kiseleva & Korolenko, 1971). 

    Studies on rats exposed by inhalation to trichloroethylene 
concentrations of 2160, 4320, or 8640 mg/m3 (400, 800, or 1600 ppm) 
for 6 h revealed no effects at the first concentration, a decrease 
in swimming activity at 4320 mg/m3, and a further decrease at 
8640 mg/m3 (Grandjean, 1963).  Other rats exposed to 1944 - 
2268 mg/m3 (360 - 420 ppm) for 8 h a day, 5 days a week for 
46 weeks, exhibited no effects (Bättig & Grandjean, 1963).  After 
43 weeks at 2160 mg/m3 (400 ppm), rats in another set of tests by 
Bättig (1964) exhibited greater maze skills.  Mice exposed 
intermittently to trichloroethylene showed a decrease in motor 
activity at 4500 mg/m3 (900 ppm), but, at 19 440 mg/m3, it was 
considerably increased (Kjellstrand et al., 1983b). 

    In Mongolian gerbils, continuously exposed to trichloroethylene 
at 1.72 mg/m3 (320 ppm) for 9 months, there was no effect on 
spatial memory, but subsequent maze performance test results were 
interpreted as indicating an irreversible effect on the central 
nervous system (Kjellstrand et al., 1980).  In another study, 2 
groups of Mongolian gerbils were continuously exposed to 810 mg 
trichloroethylene/m3 (150 ppm) for 71 and 106 days, respectively.  
In a series of maze tests following the end of exposure, the 
treated groups performed less well than the unexposed controls 
(Kjellstrand et al., 1981b). 

6.1.2.3.  Parenteral exposure

    When male Swiss Webster mice were injected ip with 3 doses of 
330 mg trichloroethylene/kg body weight (vehicle 0.2 ml of 25% 
Tween 80 in saline) on alternate days, the activity of hepatic 
microsomal NADPH cytochrome c reductase was increased.  There 
were no morphological changes in the liver (Lewis et al., 1984). 

    Studies conducted on rabbits showed that intramuscular 
administration of 3 ml trichloroethylene, 3 times weekly for 
29 days, induced neuronal damage (Bartonécek & Brun, 1970). 

6.1.3.  Long-term exposure

6.1.3.1.  Oral exposure

    The US NTP (1983) studied the effects of orally-administered 
(in corn oil, by gavage) epichlorohydrin-free trichloroethylene in 
male and female F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice.  Doses (500 and 
1000 mg/kg body weight for rats and 1000 mg/kg for mice) were 
administered 5 days per week for 103 weeks.  The survival of 
treated male rats and male mice was significantly reduced in 
relation to that of corn-oil control animals.  Mean body weights 
of treated rats (both sexes) were lower than those of corn-oil 
controls and the reduction in body weight gain was dose-related.  
The body weights of treated female mice were similar to those of 
vehicle controls. 

    Toxic nephrosis was found in 96/98 (98%) of the treated male 
rats, in 97/97 of the treated female rats, in 45/50 (90%) of the 
treated male mice, and in 48/49 (98%) of the treated female mice, 
but was not found in any of the corn-oil control rats or mice.  
Initially noted in rats that died early, the lesions were diagnosed 
as frank enlargement of the nucleus and cytoplasm of scattered 
individual tubular cells with brush borders, located near the 
cortico-medullary junction.  Progression of the lesions was 
evident.  As exposure time increased, affected tubular cells 
were larger and additional tubules and tubular cells were affected.  
Some tubules were enlarged or dilated to the extent that they were 
difficult to identify as tubules.  Eventually, there was loss of 
some enlarged cells.  Corresponding tubules became dilated and 
portions of the basement membrane had a stripped appearance.  In 
the most advanced stage, the lesion had progressed to the sub-
capsular cortex, with enlarged tubular cells. 

    In mice, the pathological development of the renal lesion was 
basically similar to that observed in rats, but it was relatively 
less severe and did not develop to a stage where there was 
extensive loss of cytomegalic epithelial cells and tubular 
dilation. 

    When trichloroethylene was given in the drinking-water (0.1, 
1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 g/litre) to CD-1 mice for 4 - 6 months, a 
significant reduction in body weight (males and females at 
5.0 g/litre), enlarged liver (males at 1.0, 2.5, and 5.0 g/litre; 

females at 5.0 g/litre), and increase in kidney weight (males and 
females at 5.0 g/litre) were observed.  However, pathology at 4 and 
6 months was unremarkable. 

6.1.3.2.  Inhalation exposure

    Studies on