IPCS INCHEM Home




    INTERNATIONAL PROGRAMME ON CHEMICAL SAFETY



    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA 132





    TRICHLORFON







    This report contains the collective views of an international group of
    experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated
    policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International
    Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization.

    Published under the joint sponsorship of
    the United Nations Environment Programme,
    the International Labour Organisation,
    and the World Health Organization

    First draft prepared by Dr J. Sekizawa, Dr M. Takeda
    and Dr K. Matsumoto (National Institute of
    Hygienic Sciences, Japan) and Dr M. Eto
    (Kyushu University, Japan), with the assistance
    of Dr J. Miyamoto and Dr M. Matsuo (Sumitomo
    Chemical Company)

    World Health Orgnization
    Geneva, 1992


         The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) is a
    joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme, the
    International Labour Organisation, and the World Health
    Organization. The main objective of the IPCS is to carry out and
    disseminate evaluations of the effects of chemicals on human health
    and the quality of the environment. Supporting activities include
    the development of epidemiological, experimental laboratory, and
    risk-assessment methods that could produce internationally
    comparable results, and the development of manpower in the field of
    toxicology. Other activities carried out by the IPCS include the
    development of know-how for coping with chemical accidents,
    coordination of laboratory testing and epidemiological studies, and
    promotion of research on the mechanisms of the biological action of
    chemicals.

    WHO Library Cataloguing in Publication Data

    Trichlorfon.

        (Environmental health criteria ; 132)

        1.Trichlorfon - poisoning 2. Trichlorfon - toxicity 
        3.Environmental exposure      I.Series

        ISBN 92 4 157132 2        (NLM Classification: WA 240)
        ISSN 0250-863X

         The World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission
    to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full.
    Applications and enquiries should be addressed to the Office of
    Publications, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, which
    will be glad to provide the latest information on any changes made
    to the text, plans for new editions, and reprints and translations
    already available.

    (c) World Health Organization 1992

         Publications of the World Health Organization enjoy copyright
    protection in accordance with the provisions of Protocol 2 of the
    Universal Copyright Convention. All rights reserved.

         The designations employed and the presentation of the material
    in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion
    whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the World Health
    Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory,
    city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation
    of its frontiers or boundaries.

         The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers'
    products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the
    World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar
    nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the
    names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital
    letters.


    CONTENTS


    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR TRICHLORFON

    INTRODUCTION

    1.  SUMMARY AND EVALUATION, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

         1.1   Summary and evaluation
               1.1.1   Exposure
               1.1.2   Uptake, metabolism,
                       and excretion
               1.1.3   Effects on organisms
                       in the environment
               1.1.4   Effects on experimental
                       animals and  in vitro
                       test systems
                1.1.5  Effects on human beings
         1.2   Conclusions
         1.3   Recommendations

    2.  IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES,
         ANALYTICAL METHODS

         2.1   Identity
         2.2   Physical and chemical properties
         2.3   Conversion factors
         2.4   Analytical methods

    3.  SOURCES OF HUMAN AND
         ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

         3.1   Natural occurrence
         3.2   Industrial production
         3.3   Uses

    4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT,
         DISTRIBUTION, AND TRANSFORMATION

         4.1   Transport and distribution
               4.1.1   Air
               4.1.2   Water
               4.1.3   Soil
         4.2   Abiotic degradation
         4.3   Biodegradation
         4.4   Environmental fate

    5.  ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND
         HUMAN EXPOSURE

         5.1   Environmental levels
               5.1.1   Air
               5.1.2   Water
               5.1.3   Soil
               5.1.4   Residues in plants
                       and animals
         5.2   Residues in food
               5.2.1   Crops
               5.2.2   Milk
               5.2.3   Meat
               5.2.4   Poultry and eggs
               5.2.5   Fish
         5.3   Occupational exposure

    6.  KINETICS AND METABOLISM

         6.1   Absorption and distribution
               6.1.1   Animal
               6.1.2   Human
         6.2   Biotransformation
         6.3   Elimination and excretion
         6.4   Reaction with body components
               6.4.1    In vitro studies
               6.4.2    In vivo studies

    7.  EFFECTS ON ORGANISMS IN THE ENVIRONMENT

         7.1   Microorganisms
         7.2   Invertebrates
         7.3   Aquatic vertebrates
         7.4   Terrestrial vertebrates
         7.5   Ecosystems

    8.  EFFECTS ON EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS
         AND  IN VITRO TEST SYSTEMS

         8.1   Acute toxicity
         8.2   Short-term exposure
         8.3   Skin and eye irritation;
               sensitization
               8.3.1   Skin irritation
               8.3.2   Skin sensitization
               8.3.3   Eye irritation
         8.4   Long-term exposure
               8.4.1   Oral administration
                       8.4.1.1   Mouse
                       8.4.1.2   Rat
                       8.4.1.3   Dog

                       8.4.1.4   Monkey
               8.4.2   Intraperitoneal administration
                       8.4.2.1   Mouse
                       8.4.2.2   Rat
                       8.4.2.3   Hamster
               8.4.3   Dermal administration
                       8.4.3.1   Mouse
         8.5   Mutagenicity
               8.5.1   DNA methylation
               8.5.2   Mutagenicity
         8.6   Carcinogenicity
         8.7   Teratogenicity and
               reproductive toxicity
               8.7.1   Mouse
               8.7.2   Rat
               8.7.3   Hamster
               8.7.4   Rabbit
               8.7.5   Congenital tremor
         8.8   Neurotoxicity
         8.9   Immunological studies
         8.10  Toxicity of dichlorvos
         8.11  Mechanism of toxicity -
               mode of action

    9.  EFFECTS ON HUMAN BEINGS

         9.1   Acute poisoning -
               poisoning incidents
         9.2   Therapeutic use of
               trichlorfon
         9.3   Occupational exposures
         9.4   Treatment of acute trichlorfon poisoning

    10.  PREVIOUS EVALUATIONS BY
         INTERNATIONAL BODIES

    REFERENCES

    ANNEX I.    Treatment of organophosphate
                insecticide poisoning in man

    ANNEX II.   No-observed-effect levels (NOELs)
                in animals treated with
                trichlorfon

    RESUME ET EVALUATION, CONCLUSIONS,
    RECOMMANDATIONS

    RESUMEN Y EVALUACION, CONCLUSIONES,
    RECOMENDACIONES
    

    WHO TASK GROUP ON ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
    CRITERIA FOR TRICHLORFON AND FENITROTHION

     Members

    Dr V. Benes, Department of Toxicology and Reference Laboratory,
    Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Prague, Czech and Slovak 
    Federal Republic

    Dr C. Carrington, Division of Toxicological Review and Evaluation,
    Food and Drug Administration, Washington DC, USA  (Joint Rapporteur)

    Dr W. Dedek, Department of Chemical Toxicology Academic of Sciences,
    Leipzig, Germany

    Dr S. Dobson, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Monks Wood
    Experimental Station, Huntingdon, United Kingdom

    Dr D.J. Ecobichon, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, McGill
    University, Montreal, Canada

    Dr M. Eto, Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Kyushu University,
    Fukuoka-shi, Japan  (Vice-Chairman)

    Dr Bo Holmstedt, Department of Toxicology, Swedish Medical Research
    Council, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

    Dr S.K. Kashyap, National Institute of Occupational Health, Ahmedabad,
    India

    Dr J. Miyamoto, Takarazuka Research Centre, Hyogo, Japan

    Dr H. Spencer, United States Environmental Protection Agency,
    Washington DC, USA  (Chairman)

    Dr M. Takeda, National Institute of Hygienic Sciences, Tokyo, Japan

     Observers

    Dr M. Matsuo, Biochemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, Sumitomo 
    Chemical Co. Ltd, Osaka-shi, Japan (representing GIFAP)

     Secretariat

    Dr J. Sekizawa, National Institute of Hygienic Sciences, Tokyo, Japan
     (Joint Rapporteur)

    Dr K.W. Jager, IPCS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
     (Secretary)

    NOTE TO READERS OF THE CRITERIA DOCUMENTS

         Every effort has been made to present information in the criteria
    documents as accurately as possible without unduly delaying their
    publication. In the interest of all users of the Environmental Health
    Criteria documents, readers are kindly requested to communicate any
    errors that may have occurred to the Director of the International
    Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organization, Geneva,
    Switzerland, in order that they may be included in corrigenda, which
    will appear in subsequent volumes.

                                   *  *  *

         A detailed data profile and a legal file can be obtained from the
    International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals, Palais des
    Nations, 1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland (Telephone no. 7988400 - 
    7985850).

    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CRITERIA FOR TRICHLORFON AND
    FENITROTHION

         A WHO Task Group on Environmental Health Criteria for Trichlorfon
    and Fenitrothion met at the World Health Organization, Geneva, from 10
    to 14 December 1990. Dr K.W. Jager, IPCS, welcomed the participants on
    behalf of Dr M. Mercier, Director of the IPCS, and the three IPCS
    cooperating organizations (UNEP/ILO/WHO). The Group reviewed and
    revised the drafts and made evaluations of the risks for human health
    and the environment from exposure to trichlorfon and fenitrothion.

         The first draft of the EHC on trichlorfon was prepared
    collaboratively by Dr M. Eto of the Kyushu University, Dr J. Miyamoto
    and Dr M. Matsuo of the Sumitomo Chemical Company, and Dr M. Takeda
    and Dr K. Matsumoto of the National Institute of Hygienic Sciences of
    Japan. The scientific editing was performed by Dr J. Sekizawa of the
    National Institute of Hygienic Sciences of Japan. Dr K.W. Jager of the
    International Programme on Chemical Safety, assisted in the
    preparation of the second draft, incorporating comments received
    following the circulation of the first drafts to the IPCS contact
    points for Environmental Health Criteria  documents.

         Dr K.W. Jager of the IPCS Central Unit was responsible for the 
    scientific content of the documents, and Mrs M.O. Head of Oxford  for
    the editing.

         The fact that Sumitomo Chemical Company Limited, Japan
    (trichlorfon and fenitrothion) and Bayer AG, Germany (trichlorfon)
    made available to the IPCS and the Task Group their proprietary 
    toxicological information on the products under discussion is 
    gratefully acknowledged. This allowed the Task Group to make its 
    evaluation on the basis of more complete data.

         The efforts of all who helped in the preparation and finalization
    of the documents are gratefully acknowledged.

    INTRODUCTION

         The major transformation product of trichlorfon in mammals,
    including human beings, is dichlorvos, the cholinesterase inhibiting
    activity of which is at least 100 times that of trichlorfon (Hofer,
    1981). Trichlorfon can be said to act in the mammalian body as a "slow
    release source" for dichlorvos, which may be of essential importance
    for, among others, its schistosomicidal effect (Nordgren, 1981;
    Nordgren et al., 1978).

         Only information directly related to trichlorfon will be
    discussed and evaluated in this publication.

         For an evaluation of the health and environmental hazards of 
    dichlorvos, the reader should refer to EHC No. 79: Dichlorvos (WHO,
    1989). A more complete treatise on the effects of organophosphorus
    insecticides in general, especially their short- and long-term effects
    on the nervous system, and their treatment, can be found in EHC No.
    63:   Organophosphorus insecticides - A  general introduction (WHO,
    1986).

         A comprehensive review of Russian literature up to 1983, on the
    toxicity and hazards of trichlorfon, has been published by the 
    International Register of Potentially Toxic Chemicals (IRPTC/GKNT,
    1983).

    1.  SUMMARY AND EVALUATION, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

    1.1  Summary and evaluation

    1.1.1  Exposure

         Trichlorfon is an organophosphorus insecticide that has been in 
    use since the early 1950s. In agriculture, it is mainly used against 
    insect pests in field and fruit crops. Trichlorfon is also used to 
    control forest insects and for the control of parasites in domestic 
    animals. Under the name of metrifonate, trichlorfon is used for the 
    treatment of human infestation by  Schistosoma haematobium.  It is
    considered to be a slow release reservoir of dichlorvos. Trichlorfon 
    is available in the form of an emulsifiable concentrate, powder, dust,
    granules, a solution, and ultra-low volume concentrates.

         The air concentration of trichlorfon insecticide may be as high
    as 0.1 mg/m3, soon after spraying, but levels decrease within days
    to below 0.01 mg/m3. Levels of trichlorfon in run-off water from 
    sprayed areas may be as high as 50 µg/litre, though levels in surface 
    waters are usually much lower and decrease rapidly.

         Trichlorfon degrades rapidly in soil, and levels generally
    decrease to negligible amounts within one month of application. It is
    relatively stable in water below pH 5.5. At higher pH, trichlorfon is
    transformed to dichlorvos. While microorganisms and plants may
    metabolize trichlorfon, the most important route of removal is abiotic 
    hydrolysis.

         With a few exceptions, levels of trichlorfon on crops are below
    10 mg/kg, the day after application, and fall to below 0.1 mg/kg,
    during the two weeks following.

         Milk from cows treated with trichlorfon for pest control may 
    contain residues as high as 1.2 mg/litre, 2 h after application, but
    the  levels decline to below 0.1 mg/litre, 24 h after treatment.
    Significant  levels of trichlorfon have not been found in meat from
    treated  animals. Eggs from treated hens have been found to contain
    0.05 mg  trichlorfon/kg.

    1.1.2  Uptake, metabolism, and excretion

         Trichlorfon is readily absorbed via all routes of exposure (oral,
    dermal, inhalation) and is rapidly distributed to the tissues of the 
    body. Peak blood concentrations were detected within 1-2 h, almost 
    total disappearance from the blood stream occurring in a matter of 
    1.5-4 h. The biological half-life of trichlorfon in the mammalian 
    blood was estimated to be in the range of 30 min.

         Trichlorfon undergoes transformation to dichlorvos (2,2-dichloro
    vinyl dimethyl phosphate), via dehydrochlorination, in water,

    biological fluids, and tissues, at pH values higher than 5.5.
    Dichlorvos is the physiologically active anticholinesterase. The main
    routes of degradation are demethylation, P-C bond cleavage, and ester
    hydrolysis via dichlorvos. The major metabolites of trichlorfon found
     in vivo are demethyl trichlorfon, demethyl dichlorvos, dimethyl 
    hydrogen phosphate, methyl hydrogen phosphate, phosphoric acid, and
    trichloroethanol. The last metabolite is found in the urine as a
    glucuronide conjugate.

         Trichlorfon and metabolic products are primarily eliminated via 
    the urine. Studies conducted with radiolabelled (14C-methyl and
    32P-) trichlorfon revealed that the bulk of the chemical was
    eliminated in the form of water-soluble material, little being
    chloroform-soluble. Some 66-70% of the water-soluble products appeared
    in the urine within 12 h while 24% of the 14C-methyl material was
    eliminated in the expired air as carbon dioxide (CO2). Low levels of
    trichlorfon and metabolites have been detected in bovine milk
    following oral and  dermal treatment of the animals.

    1.1.3  Effects on organisms in the environment

         Trichlorfon is moderately toxic for fish (96-h LC50 values
    range between 0.45 mg/litre and 51 mg/litre) and moderately to highly 
    toxic for aquatic arthropods (48-h/96-h LC50 values range between 
    0.75 µg/litre and 7800 µg/litre). However, reported concentrations of
    trichlorfon in surface waters, after application in forests at  6
    kg/ha, fall short of these ranges. Thus, in normal usage, trichlorfon
    will have little or no effect on populations of aquatic organisms,
    since other groups, such as molluscs and microorganisms are less
    sensitive than arthropods. LD50 values from laboratory studies
    ranging from 40 mg/kg to 180 mg/kg indicate that trichlorfon is
    moderately toxic for birds. However, in field studies, no effects  on
    numbers, breeding pairs, nesting success, or mortality of forest 
    songbirds were seen following aerial application of trichlorfon. An 
    observed reduction in singing and increased feeding activity may  have
    been the result of a reduction in food organisms. There is no 
    indication that trichlorfon will adversely affect organisms in the 
    terrestrial environment, other than arthropods. There is no 
    information on effects on beneficial arthropods.

    1.1.4  Effects on experimental animals and in vitro test systems

         Trichlorfon is an insecticide that is moderately toxic for 
    experimental animals. Oral LD50 values for technical trichlorfon in 
    laboratory animals range from 400 to 800 mg/kg body weight and dermal
    LD50 values for the rat are greater than 2000 mg/kg body weight.

         Trichlorfon poisoning causes the usual organophosphate
    cholinergic signs attributed to accumulation of acetylcholine at nerve 
    endings.

         Technical trichlorfon was shown to be moderately irritating to
    the eyes of rats, but was not irritating in skin tests on rabbits.
    Skin sensitization potential was demonstrated in guinea-pigs.

         Short-term, oral toxicity studies were carried out on rats, dogs,
    monkeys, rabbits, and guinea-pigs. In a 16-week study on rats, a
    4-year study on dogs, and a 26-week study on monkeys,
    no-observed-effect levels (NOELs) of 100 mg/kg diet, 50 mg/kg diet,
    and 0.2 mg/kg body weight (based on plasma, erythrocyte, or brain ChE 
    activity) respectively, were determined. Inhalation exposure of rats,
    over 3 weeks, indicated a NOEL of 12.7 mg/m3, based on the
    inhibition of plasma, erythrocyte, and brain ChE activity. Long-term 
    toxicity/carcinogenicity studies were carried out on mice, rats,
    monkeys, and hamsters after oral, intraperitoneal, or dermal 
    administration. An adverse effect on the gonads was seen following 
    the oral exposure of mice and rats at dose levels of 30 mg/kg body 
    weight and 400 mg/kg diet, respectively. In a 24-month study on rats
    and a 10-year study on monkeys, NOAELs of 50 mg/kg diet and 0.2 mg/kg
    body weight, respectively, were determined. Available data do not
    provide evidence of carcinogenicity following the long-term exposure
    of test animals by several routes of administration.

         Under physiological conditions, trichlorfon has been reported to 
    have a DNA-alkylating property. The trichlorfon mutagenicity results
    have been both positive and negative. Dichlorvos may be responsible,
    either in part or in full, for the effects observed. Most of the  in
    vitro mutagenicity studies on both bacterial and mammalian cells were
    positive while few of the  in vivo studies produced a positive
    result.

         Studies on mice, rats, and hamsters indicate that trichlorfon 
    produces a teratogenic response in rats at doses high enough to
    produce maternal toxicity. Exposure of rats to 145 mg trichlorfon/kg 
    diet, during gestation, caused fetal malformations. A gavage dose of 
    400 mg/kg body weight in hamsters also produced both maternal 
    toxicity and a teratogenic response. The lowest dose by gavage that 
    produced teratogenic effects in rats was 80 mg/kg body weight. The 
    effects appear to be time specific in the gestation period. A NOEL of
    8 mg/kg was determined in this gavage study.

         NOELs of 8 mg/kg body weight and 200 mg/kg body weight were
    demonstrated for rats and hamsters, respectively. Teratogenic 
    responses involving the central nervous system have also been 
    reported for the pig and guinea-pig.

         However, no teratogenic effects were observed in a 3-generation 
    reproduction study on rats, in which high dose levels induced adverse 
    reproductive effects. The NOEL in this study was 300 mg/kg diet.

         Very high doses have produced neurotoxic effects in animals.

         The active transformation product in mammals is dichlorvos, which
    is estimated to be at least 100 times more potent as an 
    anticholinesterase than trichlorfon.

    1.1.5  Effects on human beings

         Several cases of acute poisoning from intentional (suicide) or 
    accidental exposure have occurred. Signs and symptoms of intoxication
    were characteristic of AChE inhibition, such as  exhaustion, weakness,
    confusion, excessive sweating and salivation, abdominal pains,
    vomiting, pinpoint pupils, and muscle spasms. In  severe cases of
    poisoning, unconsciousness and convulsions developed and death usually
    resulted from respiratory failure. In cases where victims survived due
    to medical intervention, a delayed polyneuropathy, associated with
    weakness of the lower limbs, sometimes occurred a few weeks after
    exposure. In fatal cases, autopsy findings showed ischaemic changes in
    the brain, spinal cord, and vegetative ganglia, damage to the myelin
    sheath in the spinal cord and brain peduncles, and structural changes
    in the axons of peripheral nerves.

         A few cases of occupational poisoning have occurred, mainly 
    through the neglect of safety precautions. Occupational exposure at 
    a work-place where air concentrations exceeded 0.5 mg/m3 resulted  in
    decreased plasma cholinesterase and changes in the EEG pattern.
    However, these were completely reversible on cessation of exposure. No
    cases of skin sensitization have been reported.

         This compound has been extensively used for the treatment of 
    schistosomiasis in humans. Administration of a single dose (7-12
    mg/kg) resulted in cholinesterase inhibition in plasma and 
    erythrocytes in the range of 40-60%, without cholinergic symptoms.
    However, mild symptoms were observed in cases with a repeated dose
    regimen. A high dose level (24 mg/kg) caused severe cholinergic
    symptoms.

    1.2  Conclusions

         -    Trichlorfon is a moderately toxic organophosphorus ester
              insecticide. Over-exposure from handling during manufacture
              or use and accidental or intentional ingestion may cause
              serious poisoning.

         -    Trichlorfon exposure of the general population occurs mainly
              as a result of agricultural and veterinary practices, and in
              the treatment of  Schistosoma  haematobium.

         -    The reported trichlorfon intakes are far below the
              Acceptable Daily Intake established by FAO/WHO and should
              not constitute a health hazard for the general population.

         -    With good work practices, hygienic measures, and safety
              precautions, trichlorfon is unlikely to present a hazard for
              those occupationally exposed.

         -    Despite its high toxicity for non-target arthropods,
              trichlorfon has been used with few or no adverse effects on
              populations of organisms in the environment.

    1.3  Recommendations

         -    For the health and welfare of workers and the general
              population, the handling and application of trichlorfon
              should only be entrusted to competently supervised and
              well-trained operators, who will follow adequate safety
              measures and apply trichlorfon according to good application
              practices.

         -    The manufacture, formulation, agricultural use, and disposal
              of trichlorfon should be carefully managed to minimize
              contamination of the environment, particularly surface
              waters.

         -    Regularly exposed worker and patient populations should
              undergo periodic health evaluations.

         -    Application rates of trichlorfon should be limited, to avoid
              effects on non-target arthropods. The insecticide should
              never be sprayed over water bodies or streams.

    2.  IDENTITY, PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES, ANALYTICAL
        METHODS

    2.1  Identity

         Trichlorfon was first prepared by Lorenz in 1952 and then by 
    Barthel in 1954 by the reaction of dimethyl phosphite with chloral. It
    is a racemic mixture of dimethyl 2,2,2-trichloro-1-
    hydroxyethylphosphonate. Two molecules of trichlorfon are associated
    together (Lorenz et al., 1955).

    Chemical structure:

                                   O
                                   "
                             Cl3CCHP(OCH3)2
                                 '
                                 OH

    Chemical formula:             C4H8Cl3O4P

    Relative molecular mass:      257.44

    Common name:                  trichlorfon (ISO)

    Chemical name:                dimethyl 2,2,2-trichloro-1-
                                  hydroxyethylphosphonate

    Synonyms:                     chlorofos, DEP, DETF, dipterex,
                                  dimethyl 1-hydroxy- 2,2,2-trichloro
                                  ethanephosphonate,  O, O-dimethyl
                                  (2,2,2-trichloro-1-hydroxyethyl)
                                  phosphonate, metrifonate, foschlor,
                                  trichlorofon, trichlorphon

    Trade names:                  Agroforotox, Anthon, L 13/59,
                                  Bilarcil, Cekufon, Danex, Dipterex,
                                  Ditriphon, Dylox, Dyrex, Dyvon,
                                  Masoten, Metrifonate, Neguvon,
                                  Proxol, Tugon, Wotex

    CAS registry number:          52-68-6

    RTECS registry number:        TA 0700000

    Impurities:                   The purity of technical trichlofon
                                  was reported to be more than 98%
                                  (FAO/WHO, 1972). The main
                                  impurities are 2,2-dichlorovinyl
                                  dimethyl phosphate: dichlorvos (0-
                                  0.2%), trichloroacetaldehyde (0-
                                  0.05%), dichloroacetaldehyde (0-
                                  0.03%), methyl hydrogen 2,2,2-
                                  trichloro-1-hydroxyethylphospho
                                  nate; demethyl trichlorfon (0-0.3%),
                                  and water (less than 0.3%). The
                                  technical product also contains
                                  phosphoric acid, 2,2,2-trichloro-1-
                                  hydroxyethylphosphonic acid, and
                                  dimethyl phosphite (FAO/WHO,
                                  1972; Melnikov et al., 1975).

    2.2  Physical and chemical properties

         Trichlorfon is a colourless crystalline powder that is stable at 
    room temperature. It is slowly hydrolysed in acid media; the half-life
    is 526 days at pH 1-5 and 20 °C (Mühlmann & Schrader, 1957). Cleavage
    of one of the methyl ester groups takes place by acid hydrolysis. In
    alkaline media, however, trichlorfon is rapidly converted to
    dichlorvos and then hydrolytic products (see section 4.2).

         Some physical properties are given in Table 1.

    2.3  Conversion factors

              1 ppm = 11.4 mg/m3
              1 mg/m3 = 0.088 ppm, at 25 °C and 760 mmHg.

    2.4 Analytical methods

         There are several methods for the determination of trichlorfon,
    some of which are listed in Table 2. For formulation analysis,
    potentiometric titration of liberated chloride with standard silver 
    nitrate AgNO3 has been recommended (Macdougall, 1964; Bennewitz &
    Foth, 1967). The total chlorine content is determined by refluxing 
    with aqueous NaOH. On the other hand, treatment with ethanol amine at
    room temperature gives one molecule of hydrogen chloride from each
    molecule of trichlorfon. Polarography is also used (Giang & Caswell,
    1957). However, extraction with ethyl acetate and gas-chromatographic
    determination are generally applied (Zweig & Sherma, 1972).

    Table 1.  Physical and chemical properties of trichlorfona
                                                                   
    Physical state                    colourless crystals

    Melting point (°C)                83-84

    Boiling point (°C)                100 (0.1 mmHg)

    Vapour pressure (20 °C)           7.8 x 10-6 mmHg

    Volatility (20 °C)                0.022 mg/m3

                                        20
    Density                                1.73
                                        4

    Solubility in g/100 ml (25 °C)    water               15.4
                                      benzene             15.2
                                      chloroform          75.0
                                      diethyl ether       17.0
                                       n-hexane            0.08

    Partition coefficient             log Pow 0.57
     (octanol/water)

    Corrosiveness                     corrosive to metals
                                                                   
    a  From: Giang et al. (1954); FAO/WHO (1972); Dedek (1981); IARC
       (1983).

         Extraction with acetonitrile, reextraction with ether and
    gas-chromatographic determination with flame photometric detection
    (FPD) or flame thermionic detection (FTD) are standard procedures for
    the determination of residues. Trichlorfon is thermally decomposed
    during chromatography to give dimethyl phosphite which is then
    determined (Ferreira & Fernandes, 1980). Chloral generated by
    decomposition can be determined by electron-capture detector (Zweig &
    Sherma, 1972).

         Acetylation or trimethylsilylation can stabilize trichlorfon for
    gas chromatography without decomposition (Vilceanu et al., 1973; 
    Bowman & Dame, 1974). Trichlorfon itself has been successfully 
    determined at a high sensitivity using a column, such as Thermon 3000
    on Shimalite TPA. More recently, a GC- FTD method, based on on-column
    derivation by acetic anhydride, has been reported by Conrad et al.
    (1987). The response is linear over ranges of 0.1-2.0 ng. The method
    is applicable for the determination of trichlorfon in technical
    products and formulations, as well as for residues in crops and animal
    tissue samples.

    
    Table 2.  Summary of analytical methods for the determination of trichlorfon
                                                                                                                                              
    Sample         Sample preparation                       Analytical              Detection  Recovery (%)     Comments            Reference
    medium                                                  conditions              limit      (added level,
                                                            (Detector, column,                 mg/kg)
                                                            column temperature
                                                                                                                                              
    Formlation     refluxing with concentration NaOH        potentiometric                                      determination       MacDougall
                                                            titration with AgNO3                                of trichlorfon      (1964)
                                                            of total Cl-                                        in formulations

                   standing with ethanolamine for 1 h at    potentiometric                                      distinguishable     Bennewitz
                   room temperature                         titration of liberated                              between             & Foth
                                                            HCl with AgNO3                                      trichlorfon         (1967)
                                                                                                                and dichlorvos

                   ethyl acetate ext.a                      FTD-GC, 25%             0.01 µg    ±1-2%            determination       Zweig &
                                                            carbowax 20W,           accuracy                    of trichlorfon      Sherma
                                                            1.5 m (5 ft)                                        in powder           (1972)
                                                            195 °C, N2,                                         formulation
                                                            120 ml/min

                   dissolving in CHCl3 and sililating with  FID-GC, 3% XE-60,       relative   1.3%             determination       Bowman &
                   bis-(trimethylsilyl)-trifluoracetamide   1.2 m, 110 °C, He       standard                    of trichlorfon      Dame
                                                            50 ml/min               deviation                   in soluble          (1974)
                                                                                    powder
                                                                                    formulation

                   acetylating with acetic                  FTD-GC, 15%             pg                          determination       Vilceanu et
                   anhydridepyridine mixture                Apiezon L, 1 m,                                     of trichlorfon      al. (1973)
                   (2:0.5) in CH3CN                         160-200 °C, N2,                                     after acetylation
                                                            60 ml/min

    Residues       0.1 N H2SO4 diethyl ether                FTD-GC 16% XF-1150,     0.1 mg/kg  74-86 (0.1)      the extracts        Zweig &
    in food                                                 2 m (6 ft)                         102-5 (12.5)     should be           Sherma
                                                            135 °C, He                                          dialysed for        (1972)
                                                            25 ml/min                                           24 h before
                                                                                                                extraction

    Table 2 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Sample         Sample preparation                       Analytical              Detection  Recovery (%)     Comments            Reference
    medium                                                  conditions              limit      (added level,
                                                            (Detector, column,                 mg/kg)
                                                            column temperature
                                                                                                                                              
    Crops,         CH3CN+H2O/CHCH3 ext.a hexane -           FTD-GC, 20%             5 µg/kg    90-100 (0.2)     some metabolites    Takase et
    fish,          CH3CN partition CH3CN:+H2O,              carbowax 20 M,                     fat 72 (0.2)     are also            al. (1972)
    chicken        evaporation, aq. layer/heptane           1m, 150 °C, N2                                      determined
                   washing NaCl, ether ext.a                60 ml/min

    Crops,         CHCl3 ext.; reext. with activated        FPD-GC, 16%             2 µg/kg    100 (0.002-0.25) determination       Devine
    soil,          carbon/acetone (hexane sat.a NaCl ext.   XF-1150, 2 m,           (water)    water, 94-104    of trichlorfon      (1973)
    animal         CHCl3 + NaCl ext.; aq. phase/CHCl3 ext.  125 °C                  50 µg/kg   (0.05-0.2)       in forest
    tissues,       for animal tissue)                                               (others)   soil, 90-99      environmental
    water                                                                                      (0.05-50)        samples
                                                                                               plants, 82
                                                                                               (0.05-1.0)
                                                                                               animal

    Fruit          acetone ext.; 2% Na2SO4/hexane then      FTD-or FPD-GC, 5%       0.1 mg/kg  90-102%          clean-up is         Ferreira &
                   ethyl acetate N2 40 ml/min               carbowax-20 M,                     (1.0)            not necessary       Fernandes
                                                            3 m, 160-180 °C                                     for ethyl           (1980)
                                                                                                                acetate
                                                                                                                extraction

    Livestock      CH3CN ext.; 5% Na2SO4/CHCl3 ext.a        FPD-GC, 3%              2 µg/kg    90 (egg)-102     Salithion           Imanaka et
    products       haxane-CH3CN partition aq.               Thermon 3000,                      (milk) (0.4)     (same               al. (1981)
                   CH3CN/CH2Cl2 ext.a                       0.3 m, 120-170 °C,                                  retention
                                                            N2 60 ml/min                                        time) can be
                                                                                                                removed by
                                                                                                                washing with
                                                                                                                 n-hexane

    Table 2 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Sample         Sample preparation                       Analytical              Detection  Recovery (%)     Comments            Reference
    medium                                                  conditions              limit      (added level,
                                                            (Detector, column,                 mg/kg)
                                                            column temperature
                                                                                                                                              
    Milk           CHCl3 ext.                               TLC, benzenemethyl      5 µg/kg    75-100           semi-quantitative   Fechner et
                                                            acetate (3:1),                     (0.02-0.4)       determination       al. (1971)
                                                            enzymic determination                               separating
                                                            after activation                                    dichlorvos
                                                            with ammonia

    Feed           0.1% HCl ext.a; CHCl3 reext.a            FPD-GC DB-1             0.01 mg/kg 88 (50 ppm)      feed samples        Cox et al.
                                                            (FSOT) 0.53 min x                                                       (1989)
                                                            30 m 120-150 °C
                                                            (6 °C/min) He
                                                            10 ml/min

    Crops          acetone or CH3CN ext.; conc.a + NaCl     FTD-GC, methyl          0.01 ng    70-99            sep-pak             Ishizaka et
                   reext.a with diethyl ether; Sep-pak C18  silicon or                         (0.1 mg/kg)      cartridge is        al. (1986)
                   (silica gel) benzene/MeOH                phenylmethyl                                        very useful
                                                            silicon;                                            for simple
                                                            (FSOT) 0.53 mm x                                    clean-up
                                                            10 m, 160 °C

    Serum          Serum+0.1 mix well; M HCl (1=1)          FTD-GC, CBP-1           2.5 ng/ml                   extraction is       Ameno et
                   Sep-pak C18 (silica gel) 0.1 M HCl,      (FSOT) 0.53 mm x                                    not necessary       al. (1989)
                   10% & 50% aq. MeOH                       12 m 120 °C He                                      for wide
                                                            30 ml/min                                           range of
                                                                                                                calibration
                                                                                                                curve (5 approx
                                                                                                                500 ng/ml)
                                                                                                                                              
    a  ext. = extraction.
       reext. = reextraction.
       sat. = saturated.
       conc. = concentration.
    

         The simultaneous detection (µg/kg) and identification of
    trichlorfon and other organophosphorus pesticides extracted from 
    foods can be accomplished by using gas chromatography-mass
    spectrometry (Stan, 1977; Stan et al., 1977). Although the molecular 
    ion cannot be measured by the electron impact (EI) ionization mass 
    spectrum, an intense peak of the protonated molecular ion (M+1)+ is
    observed in the chemical ionization (CI) mass spectrum. Thus, the 
    latter is more sensitive and selective than the former in residue 
    determination. Field desorption mass spectrum shows the protonated 
    dimer ion (2M+1)+ of trichlorfon besides the (M+1) ion (Schulten &
    Sun, 1981). The occurrence of such ions is helpful in confirming the
    identification of trichlorfon.

         Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is particularly useful for 
    qualitative analysis. Systematic separation schemes for many 
    organophosphorus pesticides have been proposed (Guth, 1967; Getz  &
    Wheeler, 1968; Antoine & Mees, 1971; Ambrus et al., 1981). Levels of
    0.1 µg trichlorfon can be detected using nitrobenzyl-pyridine reagent
    or silver nitrate and UV irradiation on silica gel or  polyamide TLC.
    A TLC-enzyme inhibition technique, that can be used for the
    determination of residues in organophosphorus pesticides was reviewed
    by Mendoza (1973). Trichlorfon itself is not a good inhibitor of
    cholinesterase (Winterlin et al., 1968), but treatment with ammonia on
    the plate, converting it into dichlorvos, is performed to enhance its
    sensitivity (Fechner et al., 1971).

         Although high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) has 
    recently become an important technique in pesticide analysis, few 
    data are available for trichlorfon (Szalontai, 1976; Daldrup et al.,
    1981, 1982).

         Colorimetric methods have been applied for determining
    trichlorfon, based on the phosphomolybdate reaction (Sissons & 
    Telling, 1970) and the Fujiwara reaction (Cerna, 1963; Giang et al.,
    1954).

         A method to preconcentrate water samples for the measurement of
    trichlorfon was reported by Dedek et al. (1987).

         The use of gas chromatographic detectors in HPLC has recently 
    received increasing attention because of the growing need for high 
    sensitivity and selectivity. The on-line combination of HPLC and 
    these detectors, using a thermo spraying interface (TSP), has been 
    applied successfully, because the advent of miniaturized HPLC systems
    has alleviated many of the difficulties including a loss of
    sensitivity associated with direct mobile phase introduction. In most 
    cases, the techniques of HPLC separation, GC-FTD detection, and GC-MS
    confirmation can be successfully used in the analyses with
    TSP-HPLC-FTD and TSP-HPLC-MS (Gluckman et al., 1986).

         The TSP-HPLC-FTD system has been successfully used to determine
    a polar and thermally unstable pesticide like trichlorfon in many
    samples, because high sensitivity and less matrix interference are
    achieved than with the HPLC-ultraviolet spectrophotometry (UV) system
    for pesticide residues. According to Gluckman's report (1986),
    trichlorfon can be detected at a level of 40 pg by TSP-HPLC-FTD and
    the residues in tomatoes and cabbage can be determined without any
    interference.

         The characterization of several organophosphorus pesticides has 
    been achieved using positive and negative ion "filament on"
    TSP-HPLC-MS. When ammonia gas is used as a reagent one, the base  peak
    is [M + NH4]+ in the positive ion mode (PIM) for the
    organophosphorus pesticides examined, while the pesticides exhibited 
    different fragmentation behaviour in the negative ion mode (NIM)
    ([M]- in the base peak). PIM shows a higher sensitivity for these
    compounds than NIM.

         Trichlorfon and other organophosphorus pesticides can be detected
    at levels of 20-50 ng (minimum detection limit; s/n = 3) in the
    reconstructed ion chromatography of PIM-HPLC-MS. Since, a 100-fold to
    1000-fold increase in sensitivity will be expected using single ion
    monitoring (SIM), the detection limits in PIM-TSP- HPLC-MS are rather
    similar to those in GC-NCI-MS and in direct liquid introduction
    (DLI)-HPLC-NCI-MS (Barcelo, 1987; Barcelo et al., 1988; Betowski &
    Jones, 1988).

         The Joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission has given
    recommendations for the methods of analysis to be used in the 
    determination of trichlorfon residues (FAO/WHO, 1989).

         Because of the transformation of trichlorfon into dichlorvos, it
    is  necessary to have a method for the simultaneous quantification of 
    both of these compounds in biological studies. Such a method has been
    worked out by Nordgren (1981), and Nordgren et al. (1978, 1980, 1981),
    and has been correlated with the degree of enzyme inhibition. Similar
    methods have been used by Yakoub (1990).

    3.  SOURCES OF HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE

    3.1  Natural occurrence

         Trichlorfon is not a natural product. However, it is found as a 
    metabolite of the insecticide butonate: butyric acid ester of
    trichlorfon (Dedek et al., 1979).

    3.2  Industrial production

         Trichlorfon was introduced as a commercial chemical in 1952. It
    is manufactured by reacting dimethyl phosphite with chloral (Barthel
    et al., 1954; Lorenz et al., 1955).

         There is no record of the world production of trichlorfon. It is 
    produced in Germany, Japan, and Spain and is believed to be produced
    also in Argentina, Brazil, China, Israel, Mexico, the Republic of
    Korea, and the USSR. The total production in western Europe was
    estimated to be about 2000 tonnes in 1977. The production in Japan has
    ranged from 613 to 1095 tonnes per year over the last decade (Japan
    Plant Protection Association, 1985, 1986, 1989).

    3.3 Uses

         Trichlorfon is a broad-spectrum insecticide that is particularly 
    effective against  Diptera.  In agriculture, it is used mainly
    against insect pests in field and fruit crops. Trichlorfon is also
    used to control forest insects, in public health, and for the control
    of endo- and ectoparasites in/on domestic animals and fish.

         Under the generic name of metrifonate, trichlorfon is used as an 
    antihelminthic in humans and is one of the treatments of choice for 
    infestation by  Schistosoma haematobium, primarily in Africa
    (Snellen, 1981; Davis, 1986; Aden Abdi et al., 1987; Wilkins &  Moore,
    1987; Aden Abdi & Gustafsson, 1989; Yakoub, 1990; Aden  Abdi, 1990).
    The usual regimen consists of three doses of 7.5 or 10 mg/kg, given at
    intervals of 14-21 days. Because of the lower costs in comparison with
    other treatments, metrifonate is particularly attractive for mass
    treatments. It has been given to millions of patients with
    schistosomiasis with only occasional mild side effects (Nordgren,
    1981). In order to obtain better patient compliance, Aden Abdi (1990)
    recently proposed a regimen of 3 x 5 mg, administered in one day (see
    section 9.2).

         Metrifonate is also under consideration as a treatment for 
    Alzheimer's disease (Hallak & Giacobini, 1989; Becker et al., 1990; 
    Pomponi et al., 1990).

         Table 3 gives an indication of the world-wide consumption of 
    trichlorfon. Although the quantity is not reported, trichlorfon is
    used also in several other countries including Finland, Hungary,

    Malaysia, Mongolia, and the USSR. According to a Battelle report
    (1987), the total consumption of trichlorfon in 13 countries in 1987
    was 851 tonnes as shown in Table 4, which also includes data from
    other sources.

         The following formulations are used in agriculture: 50%
    emulsifiable concentrate, 95, 80, and 50% soluble powders, 50% 
    wettable powders, 5 and 4% dusts, 5, 2.5, and 1% granules, 75, 50, 40,
    and 25% ultra-low volume concentrates. Some formulations mixed with
    other organophosphorus insecticides, such as malathion and ESP, or
    with carbamate insecticides, such as carbaryl, are also used.

         The following formulations are used for animal treatments:  90,
    80, and 50% soluble powders, 6% suspension, 11% solution, 50% 
    injectable solution tablets. A 1% fly bait is also available, and a 
    0.1% preparation against house-ants. For antihelminthic prep arations,
    trichlorfon can be used in combination with atropine, fenbendazole, or
    thiabendazole.

         Tablets containing 100 mg active ingredient metrifonate are used 
    in the treatment of schistosomiasis in humans.

    Table 3.  World usage of trichlorfon
                                                  
    
    Year       Usage (tonne)      References

                                                  

    1980           3159         Battelle (1982)

    1983           2349         Battelle (1984)

    1987            851         Battelle (1987)

                                                  

    Table 4.  Usage of trichlorfona
                                                                   
    Country                 Usage    Year     Main use
                           (tonne)
                                                                   
    France                   -       1987
    Italy                  10.2      1987     vines
    Turkey                 16.4      1987     vegetables
    FRGb                   19.9      1984     sugar beet
    United Kingdomb         0.8      1984     sugar beet
    Spain                 155.3      1987     vines, vegetables,
                                              olives

    Czechoslovakiac          -       1983
    Swedenc                 5.7      1982     agriculture, hygiene
    Japan                 279.7      1987     potatoes, other
                                              vegetables

    Korea, Republic        79.0               forests, apples
    India                    -
    Indonesia               6.0      1987     soybeans
    Thailandc              19.0      1978
    Philippinesb             -       1984
    USA                   454.0d     1978     field crops, alfalfa,
                                              forests, cotton,
                                              vegetables
                            1.8      1987     alfalfa
    Mexico                133.1      1987     maize, cotton,
                                              tobacco, tomatoes,
                                              sugar cane, soybeans
    Brazil                145.3               soybeans, cotton,
                                              wheat
    Egypt                    -
    South Africa           24.6               maize
    Kenyac                   -       1983
                                                                   
    a  From: Battelle (1987).
    b  From: Battelle (1984).
    c  Information through IRPTC (International Register of
       Potentially Toxic Chemicals).
    d  From: IARC (1983).

    4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORT, DISTRIBUTION, AND TRANSFORMATION

         Following aerial application, trichlorfon is distributed to the
    air, soil, water, trees, plants, and other media. With rainfall,
    trichlorfon penetrates into the lower soil layers and moves into the
    aquatic environment.

    4.1  Transport and distribution

    4.1.1  Air

         The air/water partition coefficient of trichlorfon was determined 
    to be <5.0 x 10-7, indicating that the distributed amount in air is 
    much smaller than that in water and is, in fact, negligible (Kawamoto 
    & Urano, 1989).

    4.1.2  Water

         One and two days after the aerial application of trichlorfon to
    a  forest at the rate of 1.0 kg/ha, a small amount of the compound was 
    found in creek water (Pieper & Richmond, 1976). Trichlorfon was also
    detected in water samples in sprayed forests in Canada (Sergeant &
    Zitko, 1979).

         Rainfall caused run-off of trichlorfon from the sprayed steppe 
    zone into ponds (IRPTC/GKNT, 1983). In an agricultural region of the
    USSR, trichlorfon migrated into drainage water and was transferred
    across a significant distance, depending on the rainfall (Zakharov,
    1980).

    4.1.3  Soil

         Because of its high water-solubility (15.4 g/100 ml), there was 
    some downward movement of trichlorfon through soil with water. When
    sprayed twice on an apple orchard, the insecticide was detected in
    soil layers of 0-10 cm and 10-20 cm depth, 10 days after the last 
    treatment (Naishtein et al., 1973).

         Trichlorfon applied to the soil surface at the rate of 2.4 kg
    a.i./ha  did not move significantly into the lower layers by leaching
    (Baida, 1970); when applied at a high rate of 60 kg/ha, the compound 
    penetrated into the 60-cm layer of the soil (Naishtein, 1976).

         It has been shown, in different soils, that the disappearance of
    the insecticide (initial concentration; 10 mg/kg) is very rapid during
    the first few days following application and considerably slower
    thereafter. The levels of trichlorfon residues in a soil without
    plants were 5.2, 2.1, and 0.9 mg/kg on the 5th, 11th, and 21st days
    after application, respectively. However, in soils with tomato,
    cabbage, and potato plants, trichlorfon levels decreased more rapidly
    to 2.1, 1.0, and 0.6 mg/kg, respectively, on the 5th day, 0.7, 0.5,

    and 0.3 mg/kg on the 11th day, and 0.6, 0.3, and 0.2 mg/kg on the 21st
    day after treatment. Only a small amount of trichlorfon was detected 
    after 30 days. The rate of disappearance in soils was dependent on 
    the vegetation (Ivanova & Molozhanova, 1974).

    4.2 Abiotic degradation

         The proposed degradation pathways of trichlorfon in the
    environment are shown in Fig. 1.

         In alkaline buffers and seawater (pH 8.1), trichlorfon is
    rearranged via dehydrochlorination to yield the more potent
    cholinesterase inhibitor, dichlorvos; however, in acidic buffers or in 
    fresh water (pH 5.3), it is stable. At more alkaline pH values, the 
    anticholinesterase activity disappears slowly (Ecobichon, 1979). At 
    pH 5.5 and above, degradation to dichlorvos occurs at detectable 
    rates (Dedek, 1981).

         On photolysis in water under ultraviolet radiation (UVR),
    trichlorfon was rapidly converted to dichlorvos (2) and two
    unidentified products. These two products decomposed further on
    prolonged irradiation. Photodegradation appears to be much slower  in
    the solid state than in aqueous solution (Giovanoli-Jakubczak et  al.,
    1971).

         [32P]-trichlorfon on glass plates was photodecomposed by 7% 
    after a 5-h exposure to UVR (500 W, 200-600 nm) and by 6% after  a
    20-h exposure to sunlight. A trace amount of dimethyl hydrogen 
    phosphate (5) (see Fig. 1) and methyl hydrogen phosphate (7) were 
    identified as photodegradation-products, whereas dichlorvos (2) was 
    not detected among the photodegradation-products on the glass plates 
    in either case (Dedek et al., 1979).

         Trichlorfon is fairly stable in acidic solutions, but unstable in 
    neutral and basic solutions. The half-life of chloroform-extractable 
    radioactivity in buffer solutions at 40 °C is 46.4 days at pH 2, 16
    days at pH 5, 3.75 days at pH 6, 19 h at pH 7, 8.8 h at pH 8, and 75
    min at pH 10. Dichlorvos (2), the demethylated derivative  of
    trichlorfon (6), dimethyl hydrogen phosphate (5) and methyl hydrogen
    phosphate (7) were identified as degradation products, but they were
    not quantified (see Fig. 1; Dedek et al., 1979).

         In other studies, the half-life of trichlorfon at 100 mg/litre in 
    sterilized water-ethanol (99:1) phosphate buffers at 25 ± 3 °C, was 
    reported to be more than 1000 weeks at pH 4.5, 3.5 weeks at pH 6.0,
    0.4 weeks at pH 7.0, and 0.13 weeks at pH 8.0. It was concluded that
    the disappearance was mainly due to the conversion of trichlorfon to
    dichlorvos via dehydrochlorination (Chapman & Cole, 1982). In another
    study, the half-lives for the formation of dichlorvos from trichlorfon
    at pH 7, pH 7.5, and pH 8 were reported by Hofer (1981) to be 27, 9,
    and 3 h, respectively.

    FIGURE 1

         Formulated trichlorfon was applied to sterilized and
    non-sterilized soils with a 60% moisture content, and incubated at
    ambient temper ature under natural sunlight. At concentrations of both
    13 and  132 mg/kg, the levels of insecticide decreased to less than
    the detection limit within 40 and 50 days, respectively, under both 
    sterilized and non-sterilized conditions. It appears that the
    insecticide is readily subjected to abiotic degradation in soil
    (Yurovskaya & Zhulinskaya, 1974).

    4.3  Biodegradation

         The metabolic fate of [14C]-trichlorfon labelled at the methoxy 
    group has been studied in culture media of nodule-forming bacteria,
    such as  Rhizobium leguminosarum and  Rhizobium trifolii.  After 
    incubation for 10 days at 30 °C, the unchanged parent compound
    (19-25%) together with dimethyl hydrogen phosphate (18- 25%) (5) and
    methyl hydrogen phosphate (0.6-1%) (7) was recovered from the media.
    In addition, a trace amount of [14C] carbon dioxide was  evolved
    during the same period (Salama et al., 1975) (see Fig. 1).

         In contrast, a demethylated derivative (6) of trichlorfon and 
    2,2,2- trichlorohydroxyethylphosphonic acid (3) were shown to be the
    major metabolites in the culture media of  Aspergillus niger,
     Penicillium notatum, and  Fusarium spp. (Zayed et al., 1965).

    4.4  Environmental fate

         The metabolism of [14C]-trichlorfon labelled at the methoxy
    group has been studied in plants of the broad bean  (Vicia faba) and
    clover  (Trifolium alexandrinum).  The roots of the plants were
    immersed in a phosphate buffer at pH 6 containing [14C]-trichlorfon
    at a concentration of 50 mg/litre, and grown for 5 or 10 days in the 
    greenhouse. At harvest, the buffer solution as well as the roots of 
    the two plants contained unchanged parent compound and dimethyl 
    hydrogen phosphate (5) together with a trace amount of methyl 
    hydrogen phosphate (7) (Salama et al., 1975) (see Fig. 1).

         Following the application of [32P]-trichlorfon to stems or
    leaves, the insecticide disappeared from tomato, potato, and cotton
    plants with half-lives of 20-57 h in the greenhouse, and from plums,
    apples, cherries, peas, and wheat plants with half-lives of 0.5-7.5
    days in the field. Characterization of metabolites was not possible
    because of their volatility (Dedek et al., 1979).

         When formulated trichlorfon (0.2%) was sprayed on cabbage and 
    onion plants at a rate of 1200 litre/ha, rapid conversion to
    dichlorvos occurred. One day after treatment, the treated leaves of
    cabbage and onion plants contained the highest residues of dichlorvos
    (0.09-0.51 mg/kg) together with the parent compound (0.79-3.1 mg/kg).
    Trichlorfon disappeared from the leaves with a half-life of less than
    3 days, and dichlorvos decreased to less than the detection limit 
    within 15 days (Baida, 1975).

    5.  ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS AND HUMAN EXPOSURE

    5.1  Environmental levels

    5.1.1  Air

         When 2% trichlorfon was applied at a rate of 30 ml/m2, its 
    vapour was detected in the air. The initial concentration of 0.1
    mg/m3 decreased rapidly to 0.05-0.01 mg/m3 within 2-3 days.
    Trichlorfon was not detected after 30 days (Degtyareva et al., 1977).
    After handspraying in a vineyard at 2 and 6 kg/ha, air concentrations 
    of 0.0003 and 0.001 mg/m3, respectively, were measured. Average 
    daily concentrations of trichlorfon and its maximum single
    concentration in the Ukrainian Republic were 0.0003 and 0.0004
    mg/m3, respectively (IRPTC/GKNT, 1983).

    5.1.2  Water

         When an 18% aqueous solution of trichlorfon was sprayed on a 
    forest at a rate of approximately 1 kg/ha from a helicopter, the 
    residues were 23.4-51.9 and 8.7-12.1 µg/litre in the creek water on 
    the first and second day after application, respectively (Pieper & 
    Richmond, 1976).

         According to the monitoring programmes in Canada in 1976 and 
    1977, water samples in the forests where trichlorfon was sprayed were
    contaminated with 0.062-1.0 µg/litre of the insecticide in most of the
    year's samples in 1976, but the concentration in samples in 1977 were
    considerably lower, with a maximum value of 0.058 µg/litre (Sergeant
    & Zitko, 1979).

         Trichlorfon was measured in soil water at 0.001 (1970), 0.02
    (1971), and 0.001 mg/litre (1972) on average 1.5-2 months after 
    application (IRPTC/GKNT, 1983).

         When trichlorfon was sprayed over a mixed boreal forest in New 
    Brunswick (Canada) at a rate of 1.14 kg/ha, concentrations in stream 
    water were approximately 95 µg/litre initially and below detection 
    limit (0.05 µg/litre) two weeks after treatment (Sundaram & Varty,
    1989).

    5.1.3  Soil

         Trichlorfon was one of the chemicals found at hazardous waste 
    sites in the USA (Kokoszka & Flood, 1989). Levels were not specified.

         After the spraying of a vineyard at 2 or 6 kg/ha, trichlorfon 
    levels measured in the soil were 0.24 and 0.48 mg/kg, respectively, on
    the day of treatment. One day later, the levels in the soil were 0.49
    and 1.03 mg/kg, and 15 days later, 0.002 and 0.02 mg/kg. The average
    level of trichlorfon in the soil in the Kherson Region was 0.01 mg/kg

    (1970), 0.17 mg/kg (1971) and 0.002 mg/kg (1972). After spraying a
    forest at 0.8 kg/ha over a 200-ha area (160 kg  total), monitoring
    soil over the area gave estimates of 29.9 kg  trichlorfon remaining in
    the soil, 5 days after application and 0.43  and 0.25 kg after 10 and
    14 days, respectively. All the trichlorfon  measured was in the top 10
    cm of soil. No trichlorfon was found  18 days after spraying
    (IRPTC/GKNT, 1983).

         After aerial spraying of trichlorfon over a mixed boreal forest
    in  New Brunswick (Canada) at a rate of 1.14 kg/ha, residues in soil 
    dissipated from 3 mg/kg initially to levels below the detection limit
    (0.05 mg/kg) in about two weeks (Sundaram & Varty, 1989).

    5.1.4  Residues in plants and animals

         An 18% aqueous solution of trichlorfon was applied by helicopter 
    at 6.1 litre/ha to a forest. The residues on days 1, 2, 8, and 15
    after aerial treatment were 11.2-12.6 mg/kg, 3.8-10.4 mg/kg, 0.8-1.6
    mg/kg and below detection limit-0.6 mg/kg, respectively, on  Douglas
    fir, 68.2-81.7 mg/kg, 40.3-59.4 mg/kg, 3.9-4.5 mg/kg and  below
    detection limit, respectively, on willow, and 43.1-113.0 mg/kg,
    4.3-30.0 mg/kg, 5.3-6.3 mg/kg, and below the detection limit-2.1
    mg/kg, respectively, on grasses (detection limit: 0.1 mg/kg) (Pieper
    & Richmond, 1976).

         Trichlorfon was detected in all song birds caught in the area
    (60.7 ha), 76 h after spraying at the rate of 1.1 kg/ha. The residues 
    of trichlorfon were found at 0.01 mg/kg for blue jays and crested
    fly-catchers and at 0.013-0.04 mg/kg for baltimore oriols (Kurtz & 
    Studholme, 1974).

         When trichlorfon was sprayed at a rate of 1.14 kg a.i./ha over a 
    mixed boreal forest in New Brunswick (Canada), the initial residues 
    in foliage ranged from 10.8 to 17.3 mg/kg fresh weight, but dissipated
    rapidly to 2.6 to 6.5 mg/kg in three days (Sundaram & Varty, 1989).

    5.2  Residues in food

    5.2.1  Crops

         The results of supervised trials involving foliar treatment of 
    various crops with trichlorfon are summarized in Table 5.

         Leafy vegetables, such as lettuce, spinach, and Chinese raddish 
    leaves showed high residues of trichlorfon (several mg/kg or more)
    shortly after application. The trichlorfon residues in Chinese raddish
    leaves were about ten times higher than those in the roots. Among
    fruits, strawberries, raspberries, black currants, and red currants
    were found to contain higher trichlorfon residues than other fruits,
    such as citrus. The results in Table 5 showed that the residues
    decreased rapidly with time after application.

         During the period 1987-88, 764 home-grown and imported wheat 
    samples were analysed for pesticide residues in the United Kingdom.
    Trichlorfon was not found at, or above, the reporting limit of 0.1
    mg/kg (Osborne et al., 1989).

         Following normal field application (in a field trial) of
    trichlorfon in Portugal to Portuguese cabbage and broccoli, residue
    levels decreased to below the MRL of 0.5 mg/kg in 10 days for the
    Portuguese cabbage and two weeks for the broccoli. The difference in
    time is mainly ascribed to the much larger surface area exposed in the
    case of the broccoli (Magalhaes et al., 1989).

         The surveillance of trichlorfon residues on over twenty crops in 
    Hungary revealed that about 90.1% of the samples contained residues 
    at levels below 0.02 mg/kg (Anon. 1978a).

         Trichlorfon residues on spinach and lettuce after spraying were 
    somewhat higher in green-house crops than in field crops in West 
    Germany (Stobwasser & Kirchhoff, 1968).

         No trichlorfon residues were found in a survey of pesticide 
    residues on crops (total samples: 697) collected from a Tokyo market 
    from April 1984 to March 1989 (detection limit: 0.005 mg/kg) (Nagayama
    et al., 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989).

         Cucumber vines were sprayed to run-off with 0.05% trichlorfon 
    aqueous solution, and the fruits sampled over a period of time. The 
    half-life of trichlorfon was 1.76 days (Hameed et al., 1980).

         Grape products were prepared in a laboratory from grapes
    harvested 1 day after the last application of trichlorfon. Trichlorfon 
    residues were detected at levels of 140%, 120%, 159%, and 0.4% of the
    originally applied concentration in the grape juice, raisins, wines,
    and brandies, respectively, and the dichlorvos concentrations in the
    wines were higher than those in the grapes from which the wines were
    made (Hiramatsu & Furutani, 1978).

         Residues of 0.0002-0.006 mg trichlorfon and dichlorvos/kg were 
    detected in 8 out of 40 flower honeys in Bulgaria (Tsvetkova et al.,
    1981).

    
    Table 5.  Residues of trichlorfon in crops
                                                                                                                                              
    Crop/       Application (spray)                                 Residues (mg/kg) on the day of spraying                      Reference
    Country                                                         or at intervals [days] after applicationa
                                                                                          Day
                no.      kg/ha    formulationb                                                                          
                                               0         1/3        4/6        7/9        10/12    13/15      17/19     21
                                                                                                                                              
    Cabbage
    Finland              ns                                         0.6                            0.5        0.4       0.2      Anon. (1978b)
                                                                                                              [18-21]   [27-29]

    Japan       6        2-5      EC-50                             0.14-0.05  0.08-0.03                                         FAO/WHO (1979)
                8        2-5                                        0.23-0.07  0.05-0.03

    USSR        4        2.0      EC                     0.79-0.27  0.17                  0.09     0.07                 0.007    Baida (1975)
                                                                                                                        [30]

    Chinese cabbage
    Japan       3        2.0      EC-50                                                            0.13-0.04  0.09-0.02          Hiramatsu &
                                                                                                              [18-21]            Furutani (1977)
                5        2.0                                                              0.06     0.05                          FAO/WHO (1979)
                6        2.0                                                              0.13     0.09
                1        0.75                            0.19-0.12             0.05                0.03

    Lettuce
    Finland     1        1.2      WP-80        34-26     5.6        0.75       0.25       0.13                          0.01     Abbasov (1972)

    USA         1        0.6      WP-50        1.6       0.8        0.3        0.7                 0.3                  0.2      FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        1.2                   0.8       0.8        0.6        nd                  0.3
                1        0.6                             1.2                   0.3                 0.3                  nd
                5        1.2                                                              0.5
                6        1.2                                                                       nd
                7        1.2                                                              0.2
                                                                                                                                              

    Table 5 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Crop/       Application (spray)                                 Residues (mg/kg) on the day of spraying                      Reference
    Country                                                         or at intervals [days] after applicationa
                                                                                          Day
                no.      kg/ha    formulationb                                                                          
                                               0         1/3        4/6        7/9        10/12    13/15      17/19     21
                                                                                                                                              
    Head lettuce
    Finland     1        1.2      WP-50        22.8                 1.5        0.31                0.04                 0.01     FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        1.2                   31.2                 1.1        0.17                0.06                 nd

    FRG         1        0.75     EC-50        8.1       1.8        0.54       0.41       0.20     nd                   nd       FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        0.75                  15.9      4.6        0.21       0.08       0.14     0.05                 nd
                1        0.45                  5.8       1.8        0.22       0.09       nd       nd                   nd
                1        0.45                  4.8       4.3        0.27       nd         nd       nd                   nd

    Leaf lettuce
    Finland     1        1.2      WP-80        33.5                 2.6        0.61                                     0.03     FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        1.2                   26.4                 1.3        0.23                                     0.02

    USA         2        1.2      WP-50                  6.3        1.3        nd                  nd                            FAO/WHO (1976)
                2        1.2                             3.5        1.1        nd                  nd
                2        1.2                             3.8-0.8    0.8-0.1    0.4-nd
                2        1.2                             97.6       9.2        6.0                 3.9

    Red cabbage
    Netherlands 1        1.0      WP-80                                        0.05-0.03                                         Anon. (1978c)

    Savoy cabbage
    Netherlands 1        1.0      WP-50                                        0.36-0.12                                         Anon. (1978c)

    Parsley
    Hungary     1        0.8      WP-50                  0.2        0.02       0.01/0.01                                         FAO/WHO (1976)
                                                                                                                                              

    Table 5 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Crop/       Application (spray)                                 Residues (mg/kg) on the day of spraying                      Reference
    Country                                                         or at intervals [days] after applicationa
                                                                                          Day
                no.      kg/ha    formulationb                                                                          
                                               0         1/3        4/6        7/9        10/12    13/15      17/19     21
                                                                                                                                              
    Brussel
     sprouts
    Netherlands 3        1.2      WP-80        0.4-0.15  0.4-0.15              0.13-0.08                                         Anon. (1978c)
                4        1.2                   0.9-0.08  0.1-0.08              0.05-0.03

    Kale
    Netherlands 1        1.0      WP-80                                        0.33-0.12                                         Anon. (1978c)

    Kohlrabi
    Netherlands 1        1.0      WP-80                                        0.02-0.01                                         Anon. (1978c)

    Spinach
    Netherlands 1        1.0      WP-80                             5.3-3.4                                                      FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        1.0                                        6.2-2.1

    Spinach
    (greenhouse)
    Netherlands 1        1.1      WP-50        33.3-23.3 5.5-2.9    3.4-1.2    1.3-0.4    0.9-0.2  0.4-0.2    0.5-0.1            FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        1.1                   4.5-1.9   3.1-1.2    0.8-0.4    0.5-0.25   0.3-0.2  0.1-0.06

    Spinach
    (under frame)
    FRG         1        0.75     WP-50                  4.4                              2.4                           1.6      FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        0.75                  30        21.5       5.2        1.2        2.2                           0.25

    Spinach
    (outdoor)
    Canada      2        1.1      WP                                0.6        0.2                 nd                            FAO/WHO (1976)
                2        1.1                                        39         3.5                 nd
                                                                                                                                              

    Table 5 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Crop/       Application (spray)                                 Residues (mg/kg) on the day of spraying                      Reference
    Country                                                         or at intervals [days] after applicationa
                                                                                          Day
                no.      kg/ha    formulationb                                                                          
                                               0         1/3        4/6        7/9        10/12    13/15      17/19     21
                                                                                                                                              
    FRG         1        0.75                                       2.0        1.6        0.7      0.35                          FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        0.75                                       0.4        0.02
                1    ca. 1.5      WP-80                             19.8       1.8
                1        0.75     WP-50        34        6.0        0.85       0.15       0.15
                1        0.75     WP-50        30                   1.7        0.3        0.08
                1        0.75                  30        13.2       5.6        1.0        1.0

    Netherlands 1        0.5      WP-50        6.5-5.7   2.7-1.2    2.1-0.08   0.6-0.1    0.3-0.2                                FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        0.63                  2.2-1.8   1.1-0.4    0.6-nd     0.2-0.1    0.2-nd
                1        1.9                   1.4-0.5              0.3-0.05   0.01-nd
                1        0.7                   1.4-0.6   0.3-0.2    0.4-nd     0.7-nd

    USA         2        1.1                                        11.2       0.3                 0.3                           FAO/WHO (1976)
                2        1.1                                                   0.9                 0.4
                2        1.1                                        1.8        0.2                 nd

    Lima bean
    USA         1        2.22     EC                                                                                    0.07-0.02FAO/WHO (1976)
                                                                                                                        [44]

    Chinese radish
    Japan
    (leaf)      5        2.0      EC-50                  2.76-0.22  0.26-0.09  0.07-0.02                                         FAO/WHO (1979)

    (root)      5        2.0                             0.12-0.07  0.07-0.03  0.05-0.01

    (leaf)      8        2.0                             1.4-0.9    0.77-0.1   0.09-0.03
                                                                                                                                              

    Table 5 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Crop/       Application (spray)                                 Residues (mg/kg) on the day of spraying                      Reference
    Country                                                         or at intervals [days] after applicationa
                                                                                          Day
                no.      kg/ha    formulationb                                                                          
                                               0         1/3        4/6        7/9        10/12    13/15      17/19     21
                                                                                                                                              
    Chinese radish
    Japan
    (root)      8        2.0                             0.12-0.08  0.04-0.03  0.04-0.01                                         FAO/WHO (1979)

    (leaf)      8        1.5-2.0   not stated            1.4-0.22   0.77-0.10  0.09-0.03

    Onion
    USSR        4        2.0      EC                     2.7-3.1    0.90-1.2   0.02-0.77           nd-0.04              nd [30]  Baida (1975)

    Potato
    Japan       6        2.0      EC-50                                        0.03-0.02  0.02-nd                                FAO/WHO (1979)

    Egg plant
    Japan       5        1.0      EC-50                             0.03-0.02  0.01-nd    nd                                     FAO/WHO (1979)
                8        1.0                                        0.02       0.007-nd

    Green pepper
    Hungary     1        1.0      WP-50        0.13      0.06       0.05       0.03       0.02     0.02                          Anon. (1978a)
                                                                                                   [16]

    Tomato
    (glasshouse)
    Netherlands 1        1.2      WP-50                  0.03-nd                                                                 FAO/WHO (1976)
                1        1.2                             0.13-nd                                                                 Abbasov (1972)

    Apple
    Netherlands 1        1.2      WP                                                      0.9-0.6                                Anon. (1978c)
                1        1.2                                                              1.9-0.1                                Anon. (1978c)
                                                                                                                                              

    Table 5 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Crop/       Application (spray)                                 Residues (mg/kg) on the day of spraying                      Reference
    Country                                                         or at intervals [days] after applicationa
                                                                                          Day
                no.      kg/ha    formulationb                                                                          
                                               0         1/3        4/6        7/9        10/12    13/15      17/19     21
                                                                                                                                              
    Grape
    Japan       1-5      1.0      EC-50        1.6-0.8   1.4-0.28   0.9-0.4    0.4-0.26            0.15-0.1                      Hiramatsu &
    (unsacked)                                                                                                                   Furutani (1978)

    (sacked)                                   0.1 5     0.07       0.08       0.06                0.06

    Lemon
    USA         1        4.5      WP-80                                                                                 nd       Iwata at el. (1979)
                                                                                                                        [52-59]

    Orange
    USA         1        4.5      WP-80                                                                                 nd       Iwata et el. (1979)
                                                                                                                        [52-59]

    Mandarin
     orange
    Japan       5        3.0      EC-50                                                                                 nd       FAO/WHO (1979)
                                                                                                                        [27-29]

    Kski
    persimmon
    Japan       3        3g/tree  EC-50                  0.57-0.53  0.36                           0.3-0.25                      FAO/WHO (1979)

    Raspberry
    Finland     2        0.8g/    not stated                                                       5.6                           Anon. (1978b)
                         linear
                         0.5-0.6g/                                                                            2.9-0.7            Anon. (1978b)
                         plant                                                                                [18-21]
                                                                                                                                              

    Table 5 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Crop/       Application (spray)                                 Residues (mg/kg) on the day of spraying                      Reference
    Country                                                         or at intervals [days] after applicationa
                                                                                          Day
                no.      kg/ha    formulationb                                                                          
                                               0         1/3        4/6        7/9        10/12    13/15      17/19     21
                                                                                                                                              
    Strawberry
    Japan       3        2.0      EC-50                                                            1.4        0.31               FAO/WHO (1979)
                                                                                                              [18-21]
                5        2.0                                        4.6                            0.75
                3        3.0                                                                       2.12       0.46
                                                                                                              [18-21]
                5        3.0                                                   3.31                1.06
                1        1.6-2.4                                                                              0.02
                                                                                                              [18-21]
                3        2-3      not stated                                              2.1-1.4             0.46-0.33
                                                                                                              [20-21]
                5        2-3      not stated                        4.6-3.3               1.1-0.74

    Water melon
    not stated  6        2.0      EC-50                                        0.008                                             FAO/WHO (1979)

    Black currant
    Finland              1.3g/    not stated                                                       2.6                  0.2      Anon.(1978b)
                         plant                                                                                          [27-29]

    Red current
    Finland              1.6g/    not stated                                                       25                   12       Anon.(1978b)
                         plant                                                                                          [27-29]

    Rye-grass
    USA         1        1.1      5% bait      37.5                 3.1        1.9                                      0.1      van Middalem et
                                                                                                                                 al. (1972)
                                                                                                                                              

    Table 5 (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Crop/       Application (spray)                                 Residues (mg/kg) on the day of spraying                      Reference
    Country                                                         or at intervals [days] after applicationa
                                                                                          Day
                no.      kg/ha    formulationb                                                                          
                                               0         1/3        4/6        7/9        10/12    13/15      17/19     21
                                                                                                                                              
    Cotton
    USA         4        3.7-1.4  WP-50                  79         4                                                            Isaac at al. (1965)

    Sugar beet
    Japan       6        1.5      EC-50                                        0.05-0.02           0.04-0.02                     FAO/WHO (1979)
                8        1.5                                                   0.04-0.02           0.024-0.020

    Finland     2        0.64     not stated                                                                            0.05     Anon. (1978b)
                                                                                                                        [48]
                6        1.5      not stated                        0.24-0.06                      0.07-0.02
                8        1.5      not stated                        0.26-0.05                      0.08-0.02
                                                                                                                                              
    a  nd = not detectable;
       ns = not stated.
    b  WP = Wettable powder;
       EC = Emulsifiable concentrate.
    
    5.2.2  Milk

         The results of supervised trials in which cows were treated with 
    trichlorfon via several routes of exposure and the residues in the
    milk  measured are summerized in Table 6.

         Trichlorfon residues in cow's milk were mainly studied in animals
    that were administered the pesticide orally. The reports showed
    relatively high levels and a gradual disappearance of trichlorfon in
    the milk of treated cows. The residue values in  FAO/WHO report (1979)
    were much higher than those in others (Table 6).

         To control botflies, a 11.2% aqueous solution of trichlorfon was 
    applied dermally to lactating cows. Maximum residues of trichlorfon 
    and dichlorvos were found in the first milking (0.2 and 0.03 mg/litre,
    respectively) and were still detectable in the third milking. Storage 
    and short-term heating of the milk did not essentially degrade the 
    insecticide, but, with boiling, an accelerated transformation of 
    trichlorfon to dichlorvos took place (Fechner et al., 1968).

         Treatment of cows with 0.25 or 0.5% aqueous solution of 
    trichlorfon resulted in residues in milk of 0.02 and 0.7 mg/litre,
    respectively, within the first 72 h following treatment. The levels of 
    trichlorfon were higher in the morning than in the evening flow
    (IRPTC/GKNT, 1983).

         The trichlorfon residues in cow's milk were in direct proportion 
    to the veterinary use of the insecticide on the cows. Heat processing 
    of milk had little effect on trichlorfon residues. However,
    evaporation or spray drying of the milk reduced the residue levels 
    considerably (Konrad et al., 1975).

    5.2.3  Meat

         Trichlorfon residues in pigs and sheep treated with the chemical 
    under supervised trial conditions are shown in Table 7. The results 
    revealed that trichlorfon residues in pork rapidly disappear; they
    were  below the detection limit (0.01 mg/kg) 24 h after subcutaneous 
    application of 25 mg/kg body weight. The residues following spray 
    treatment of sheep against harmful insects decreased to below the 
    detection limit (0.01 mg/kg) after 168 h (Dedek & Schwarz, 1970a).

         32P-labelled trichlorfon was poured evenly on to 600 cm2
    areas of the freshly shorn backs of sheep at a rate of 20 mg/kg. Only
    a minimal concentration (0.1 mg/kg) of the insecticide was detected in 
    the blood of the sheep. However, trichlorfon levels in the blood of
    cattle were higher than those in the blood of sheep at a similar dose.
    When special solvents were used for the preparation of the trichlor
    fon solution and the dose was increased to 50 mg/kg, the level of 
    residues in the blood of the sheep increased to 1.2 mg/litre (Dedek 
    & Schwarz, 1970b).


        Table 6.  Residues of trichlorfon in milk of cows after application
                                                                                                                                              

    Method of                                           Residues (mg/kg) in milk after application                                   Reference
    application                                                                                                                               
                     mg/kg  1 h    2 h      3 h   4 h   6 h   8 h       9 h    10 h   12 h      20 h     24 h   32-72 h  96 h  168 h
                                                                                                                                              
    Dermal           80            0.1-0.25                   0.05-0.25                                                  0.05        Mollhoff
                                                                                                                                     (1971)

    Dermal           36                                       0.1-0.2                                    0.05                        Mollhoff
                                                                                                                                     (1971)

    Dermal           100                                      0.1-0.2                           0.05-0.1        0.01                 Mollhoff
                                                                                                                                     (1971)

    Dermal           100                                                              0.05-0.1  0.05                                 Mollhoff
                                                                                                                                     (1971)

    Oral             3      0.033           0.091       0.080           0.052                            0.003  0.001                Nakahara 
                                                                                                                                     et al.
                                                                                                                                     (1972)

    Oral             30     0.56            0.33        0.25            0.16                             0.007  0.001                Nakahara 
                                                                                                                                     et al.
                                                                                                                                     (1972)

    Oral             1a     0.034           0.029                       0.021                            0.009  0.001                Nakahara
                                                                                                                                     et al.
                                                                                                                                     (1972)

    Intramuscularb   25            2.4            1.3   0.7   0.5              0.25                      0.1                         Dedek &
                                                                                                                                     Schwarz
                                                                                                                                     (1966)
                                                                                                                                              

    Table 6. (continued)
                                                                                                                                              
    Method of                                           Residues (mg/kg) in milk after application                                   Reference
    application                                                                                                                               
                     mg/kg  1 h    2 h      3 h   4 h   6 h   8 h       9 h    10 h   12 h      20 h     24 h   32-72 h  96 h  168 h
                                                                                                                                              

    Pour-ond         20            1.2            0.5   0.3   0.2              0.1                       0.05                        FAO/WHOc
                                                                                                                                     (1979)

    Pour-one         20            0.2            0.3   0.35  0.35             0.2                       0.1                         FAO/WHOc
                                                                                                                                     (1979)

    Pour-onf         30                                                        0.45                                      0.05  0.01  Dedek &
                                                                                                                                     Schwarz
                                                                                                                                     (1966)
                                                                                                                                              
    a  1 mg trichlorfon/kg body weight for 5 days.
    b  50% trichlorfon in polyethylene glycol.
    c  Data cited to fit in this table.
    d  2% trichlorfon in mineral oil.
    e  2% trichlorfon in vegetable oil.
    f  5.7% in aqueous solution.
    
         Six USSR reports were available concerning supervised trials on 
    pigs (7 mg/kg in meat and 12 mg/kg in fat after unspecified treatment;
    Yonova & Zhecheva, 1974), and sheep (Nepoklonov & Bukshtynov, 1971).
    According to the English summaries of the reports, the trichlorfon was
    rapidly absorbed and distributed among various organs and tissues,
    then metabolized and eliminated.

    5.2.4  Poultry and eggs

         The trichlorfon contents of the organs of hens treated externally 
    with 1-8% aqueous solutions were 0.03-1.5 mg/kg, 0.01-0.7 mg/kg,
    0.04-1.0 mg/kg, 0.02-0.8 mg/kg, 0.01-1.5 mg/kg or 0.02-0.9 mg/kg in
    the muscle, liver, lung, heart, kidney and brain, respectively, within
    the first 5 days after application. The eggs from hens treated 
    externally with 6-8% trichlorfon contained trichlorfon levels of
    0.01-0.05 mg/kg (IRPTC/GKNT, 1983).

         Residues of trichlorfon one day after the spraying of chickens at 
    the rate of 150 mg/kg body weight were as follows (mg/kg): egg shell,
    0.48; egg white, 0.27; egg yolk, not detectable. Trichlorfon was
    preserved in chicken carcasses kept for six months at -10 °C, but it
    quickly decomposed when the carcasses were boiled (Dmitriyev, 1970).

    5.2.5  Fish

         Trichlorfon residues in eels were determined 1 and 5 days after 
    ponds were treated with a 1 mg/litre aqueous solution of the 
    insecticide. The results showed that the insecticide decomposed in  a
    short time to form dichlorvos in neutral and weakly alkaline water. In
    pond water with a pH of 8-10, less than 10% of the applied 
    trichlorfon was degraded after 30 min and dichlorvos was detected. The
    residues of trichlorfon and dichlorvos in the eels were 0.009-0.032
    mg/kg and <0.005-0.02 mg/kg, respectively, on the first day 
    following treatment, and 0.011 mg/kg and 0.009-0.032 mg/kg,
    respectively, on the 4th day after treatment. There was a good 
    correlation between the residual amounts of trichlorfon in the eels 
    and the concentrations in the water. Residues of trichlorfon and 
    dichlorvos, which were detected on the skin of eels in water at pH
    7.0, could be removed by rinsing. Insecticide residues were found in
    the internal organs of only one out of 7 eels caught in the field
    pond. Carps exposed to an aqueous solution of trichlorfon at 0.25
    mg/kg were examined on the 2nd, 4th, and 9th days after exposure.
    Residues of trichlorfon and dichlorvos could not be detected in the
    fish on the second day (Nakahara et al., 1973).

    
    Table 7.  Residues of trichlorfon in various meats after experimental application
                                                                                                                                    
    Animal   Method of     mg/kg or                        Residues (mg/kg) after application                            Reference
             application   g/m3                                                                                         
                                      1 h    2 h    3 h    4 h   6 h   12 h   24 h   48 h  72 h   120 h   168 h   240 h
                                                                                                                                    

    Hen      spray         150 g/m3                              1.26         0.96   ND                                  Dmitriyev
                                                                                                                         (1970)

    Pig      subcu-        25 mg/kg   6      5      3-4    2-3   1     0.1    0.01                                       Dedek &
             taneous                                                                                                     Schwarz
                                                                                                                         (1970)

    Sheep    spray         4 g/m3                                             2.3          0.8    0.6     trace   NDa    Nepoklonov&
                                                                                                                         Bukshtynov
                                                                                                                         (1971)
                                                                                                                                    
    a  ND = not detectable.
    
    5.3  Occupational exposure

         A thousand-fold dilution of 50% trichlorfon emulsifiable
    concentrate was applied to apple trees by operators using a speed 
    sprayer or a power sprayer; the operators wore their usual working 
    clothes or special protective clothes, plus rubber gloves, full length 
    rubber boots, and masks with, or without, charcoal filters. The 
    plasma and red blood cell cholinesterase activity of the operators 
    following both kinds of spraying did not show any significant  changes
    compared with pre-exposure values. The calculated cumulative
    trichlorfon exposures per person with a speed sprayer and a power
    sprayer were 177 ± 54.0 mg and 1179 ± 398 mg, respectively (Kawai et
    al., 1982).

         Occupational exposures to levels exceeding 0.5 mg/m3 have been 
    reported (Lu et al., 1984; Hu et al., 1986).

    6.  KINETICS AND METABOLISM

    6.1  Absorption and distribution

    6.1.1  Animal

         In cattle, percutaneous absorption of 32P-labelled trichlorfon
    after pour-on application is extremely affected by the solvent used
    (Dedek & Schwarz, 1967). With a 2% aqueous solution, only very little
    trichlorfon ended up in the blood (about 0.15 mg/litre). In contrast,
    trichlorfon in a 2% mineral oil solution, was absorbed rapidly,
    reaching a maximum concentration in the blood of 3.1 mg/litre at 42
    min. The percutaneous absorption rate was considerably slower in
    sheep, than in cattle (Dedek & Schwarz, 1970). In  in vitro 
    absorption studies on isolated cattle skin, partition of trichlorfon
    was dependent on the relative solubilities in the water (blood) and
    organic phases (Dedek & Schwarz, 1967).

         Trichlorfon administered orally to mammals is rapidly absorbed,
    degraded, and eliminated. When 32P-labelled trichlorfon was
    administered orally to a cow (25 mg/kg), the radioactivity appeared in
    the blood within half an hour and reached a maximum (15.1 mg/litre
    trichlorfon equivalent) between 1 and 3 h. It, then decreased rapidly
    (less than 1 mg/litre) within 24 h of treatment (Robbins et al.,
    1956). In the liver and brain of a mouse treated orally with
    32P-trichlorfon (6.2 mg/mouse), chloroform extractable radioactivity
    of 188 mg/kg and 28.2 mg/kg trichlorfon equivalents, respectively, was
    found, 15 min after treatment (Miyata & Saito, 1973). The
    radioactivity decreased rapidly to 6.4 and 1.61 mg/kg trichlorfon
    equivalents, respectively, at 4 h. The biological half-life of
    trichlorfon in mice was about 80 min, when it was administered orally.

         Thirty minutes after radiolabelled trichlorfon was given by
    stomach tube to pregnant guinea-pigs on days 35 and 52 of gestation,
    the compound had rapidly become distributed to the main organs of the
    animals, the highest concentrations being present in the liver,
    kidney, and lung. Thirty minutes after dosing, there was a substantial
    uptake of trichlorfon into the fetus, and this became more pronounced
    at the later stage of gestation (52 days), the concentration in fetal
    liver equalling that in the placenta at that time (Berge & Nafstad,
    1986).

    6.1.2  Human

         In the blood of a patient who ingested 10 g of trichlorfon, the
    concentration of the insecticide was 270 µg/litre after 24 h,
    following which it rapidly decreased and was undetectable after 94 h
    (Fournier et al., 1978). In a 70-year-old woman who died from acute
    trichlorfon poisoning, caused by the ingestion of a 50% emulsifiable 
    concentrate, the levels of trichlorfon in the organs (µg/g) were 310 
    in the blood, 487 in the liver, 465 in the brain, 416 in the kidney,

    and 2240 in the urine. In addition, about 7.2 g of trichlorfon was
    found in the stomach contents (Yashiki et al., 1982).

         A 76-year-old male, who had attempted suicide by ingesting about
    50 ml of trichlorfon, died approximately 8 h later. The trichlorfon
    concentration was found to be 215 µg/g in a blood sample and 15.0 mg/g
    in a gastric lavage liquid sample, both of which were collected about
    1 h after intake (Yashiki et al., 1988).

         Following the administration of metrifonate to humans at doses of
    7.5-10 mg/kg body weight, peak levels of trichlorfon in the plasma (8
    µg/ml) were reached in 2 h or less. Detectable levels were still
    present in the body after 8 h (Nordgren, 1981).

         Four groups of 4 healthy human volunteers each were given
    metrifonate at 2.5, 5, 7.5, or 15 mg/kg (single dose). Peak plasma
    levels of 5-10, 5-15, 10-25, or 15-100 µmol/litre were observed after
    each of the respective doses. There was no evidence of dose- dependent
    kinetics (Aden Abdi, 1990).

    6.2  Biotransformation

         Trichlorfon(1) rearranges readily to form dichlorvos
    (2,2-dichlorovinyl dimethyl phosphate)(2) via dehydrochlorination
    (Lorenz et al., 1955; Metcalf et al., 1959; Nordgren et al., 1978;
    Hofer, 1981; Nordgren, 1981). This transformation occurs under
    physiological conditions (Miyamoto, 1959). Dichlorvos has been found
    in animal tissues  in vivo at less than 5% of the administered dose
    following trichlorfon treatment (Metcalf et al., 1959; Nordgren et
    al., 1978; Dedek, 1981). However, it could not be detected very often
    and only its degradation products, such as demethyl dichlorvos
    (2,2-dichlorovinyl methyl hydrogen phosphate)(4) were found, as
    evidence of the formation of dichlorvos  in vivo (Arthur & Casida,
    1957; Bull & Ridgway, 1969; Miyata & Saito, 1973; Otto et al., 1980).
    Dichlorvos is also formed from trichlorfon in humans. Following the
    administration of metrifonate, dichlorvos was found in erythrocytes
    and plasma at levels corresponding to 0.2-1% of the metrifonate
    concentrations (Nordgren, 1981; Aden Abdi, 1990).

         In  in vitro experiments, the conversion of trichlorfon into
    dichlorvos was demonstrated by incubating with serum (Dedek & Schwarz,
    1966), with the soluble fraction from cow and chicken liver
    homogenates (Akhtar, 1982), and with the digestive juice of the
    silkworm larvae (Sugiyama & Shigematsu, 1969). Demethylation also
    occurred with liver homogenates. The half-life of trichlorfon in the
    blood of various mammals  in vitro ranged up to 30 min (Dedek &
    Schwarz, 1966). Using housefly homogenate, another metabolite was
    produced with the same mass spectrum as dichlorvos, but a different
    Rf value on TLC; it was proposed that this was dimethyl
    2,2-dichloro-1-hydroxyvinylphosphonate (Lange, 1980).

         The main metabolites of 32P-trichlorfon found in mammals were
    demethyl trichlorfon (Fig. 2)(6), demethyl dichlorvos(4), dimethyl
    hydrogen phosphate(5), methyl hydrogen phosphate(7) and phosphoric
    acid(8) (Hassan et al., 1965; Bull & Ridgway, 1969; Miyata & Saito,
    1973). The percentages of the water-extractable metabolites found in
    the whole body in mice, 0.5 and 4 h after oral administration of 6.2
    mg 32P-trichlorfon, were respectively, demethyl trichlorfon (4.3,
    4.0), demethyl dichlorvos (20.8, 9.9), dimethyl hydrogen phosphate
    (34.6, 47.8), methyl hydrogen phosphate (14.3, 17.8), phosphoric acid
    (22.4, 20.9), and unknown compounds (3.6, 0.0) (Miyata & Saito, 1973).

         The glucuronide of trichloroethanol(9) was isolated from the
    urine of a dog in amounts equivalent to 67% of the administered dose
    of trichlorfon, indicating the occurrence of hydrolytic P-C bond
    cleavage (Arthur & Casida, 1957). Another glucuronide containing
    phosphorus and chlorine atoms in 1:2 ratio was found in the urine of
    rabbits administered with trichlorfon (Miyamoto, 1961).

         Thus, the main degradation routes of trichlorfon are
    demethylation, P-C bond cleavage, and ester hydrolysis via dichlorvos.
    Proposed metabolic pathways of trichlorfon, together with the
    established metabolic pathways of dichlorvos, are illustrated in
    Fig. 2.

    6.3  Elimination and excretion

         Trichlorfon administered to mammals is rapidly eliminated,
    primarily via the urine. About 66% of the dose administered orally to
    cows was eliminated in the urine within 12 h. Following oral
    administration (6.2 mg/animal) of 32P-trichlorfon to mice, 70% of
    the total dose was eliminated in the urine and faeces in 12 h (Miyata
    & Saito, 1973). More than 80% of the eliminated compound was present
    in the urine. The majority of the eliminated radioactive compounds in
    both the urine and faeces were degradation products, and only a small
    percentage of them were chloroform extractable. The biological
    half-life of trichlorfon administered orally to mice was estimated to
    be about 80 min (Robbins et al., 1956).

         When methyl-14C-trichlorfon was administered intraperitoneally 
    to rats, 24% of the radioactive carbon was eliminated as carbon
    dioxide in the expired air, within 10 h; 32% was present in the urine
    as formate and dimethyl hydrogen phosphate, within 24 h (Hassan &
    Zayed, 1965).

         Residues of trichlorfon were detected in the milk following the
    oral treatment of cows. Less than 0.2% of the total dose administered
    was recovered in the milk at the end of 144 h (Robbins et al., 1956).
    Single doses of 3 or 30 mg/kg body weight resulted in maximum residues
    in the milk of 0.09 mg/kg in 3 h and 0.55 mg/kg in 1 h, respectively;
    the residues then decreased rapidly to 0.003-0.007 mg/kg at 24 h. A
    small amount of dichlorvos (0.04 mg/kg) was detected as a metabolite

    FIGURE 2

    in the milk, 1-3 h after the higher dose (Nakahara et al., 1972). When
    lactating cows were treated dermally by washing with 11.2%
    trichlorfon, 6-8 h before milking, trichlorfon residues (equal to or
    more than 0.2 mg/kg) and dichlorvos residues (0.03 mg/kg) were found
    in the first milking (Fechner et al., 1968). Trichlorfon was detected
    up to the third milking, 32 h after application, but neither
    trichlorfon nor dichlorvos could be demonstrated in the fourth
    milking.

    6.4  Reaction with body components

    6.4.1  In vitro studies

         Several investigators have reported the considerable inhibitory
    activity of trichlorfon on acetylcholinesterase  in vitro.  The
    pI50 for acetylcholinesterase was 5.5 and the bimolecular rate
    constant for rat brain acetylcholinesterase was 3.18 × 104/min
    (Arthur & Casida, 1957; Buchet & Lauwerys, 1970). The activity is,
    however, strongly pH-dependent and is about 30-fold more active at pH
    7.4-7.6 than at pH 6.0-6.5. At the lower pH range, trichlorfon is more
    stable with practically no inhibiting activity against
    cholinesterases. In contrast, dichlorvos is equally active at this pH
    range (Metcalf et al., 1959; Miyamoto 1959; Reiner et al., 1975).
    However, the rates of non-enzymatic reactivation of the enzymes after
    inhibition by trichlorfon and dichlorvos are similar. Thus, it is now
    believed that the  in vitro inhibitory activity of trichlorfon is due
    to its rapid, spontaneous, non-enzymatic conversion into dichlorvos.

         Frohlich et al. (1990) determined the competitive and
    uncompetitive constants for the action of trichlorfon on bee
     p-nitrophenyl acetate hydrolysing esterase to be 4.5 × 10-6
    mol/litre and 1.6 × 10-5 mol/litre, respectively.

         The inhibition constant for trichlorfon and chicken liver fluora
    cetanilidase was determined to be 2.5 × 10-6 mol/litre (Nakamura &
    Ueda, 1967).

    6.4.2  In vivo studies

         In rats given trichlorfon intraperitoneally at 150 mg/kg,
    considerable increases in the activities of superoxide dismutase
    (× 1.94) and microsomal cytochrome P-450 (× 2.09), and in lipid
    peroxidation (× 1.44) in the liver were observed, 2.5 h after
    treatment (Matkovics et al., 1980).

         In  in vivo studies on mice receiving a diet containing 100 mg
    trichlorfon/kg, the cholinesterase activities in the brain,
    erythrocytes, and plasma were, respectively, 72.1, 115.7, and 92.7% of
    control values after one-day (24 h) and 79.9, 83.8, and 81.0%,
    respectively, after 20 days (Tsumuki et al., 1970).

         A mixture of trichlorfon and phenothiazine, which was
    administered to horses with feed as an antihelminthic at a single dose
    level of 35.8 mg/kg, reduced the cholinesterase activity in whole
    blood and plasma to 32 and 20%, respectively, by 24 h. The activity
    increased to about 80% after 4 weeks (Bello et al., 1974).

         I